Adam Stauffer v. County of Monroe, et al
| Adam Eli Stauffer |
| County of Monroe, County of Wayne, State of New York, Lori-Ann Fordham-Speranza and Tom Speranza |
| 25-7185 |
| November 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, U.S. District Court. [25-7185] [Entered: 04/20/2026 02:28 PM] |
| PER CURIAM ORDER [2162966] filed ORDERED that the order to show cause [ # 2147239-4 ] be discharged. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Henderson, Pillard and Pan. [25-7185] [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:54 PM] |
| NOTICE [2160231] filed by Adam Eli Stauffer [Service Date: 02/03/2026 ] [25-7185] [Entered: 02/20/2026 01:22 PM] |
| NOTICE [2153147] filed by Adam Eli Stauffer [Service Date: 01/06/2026 ] [25-7185] [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:24 PM] |
| NOTICE [2153145] filed by Adam Eli Stauffer [Service Date: 01/06/2026 ] [25-7185] [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:23 PM] |
| APPELLANT BRIEF [2148432] filed by Adam Eli Stauffer [Service Date: 12/01/2025 ] Length of Brief: 286 pages. [25-7185] [Entered: 12/03/2025 02:55 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [25-7185] [Entered: 11/25/2025 02:30 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2147234] seeking review to Clerk, U.S. District Court in 6:25-cv-06036-MAV filed by Adam Eli Stauffer. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 25-7185. [25-7185] [Entered: 11/25/2025 02:37 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2147237] filed directing appellant to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 12/26/2025. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. [25-7185] [Entered: 11/25/2025 02:39 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2147239] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 12/26/2025. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. [25-7185] [Entered: 11/25/2025 02:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
