In re: Roger Shekar
Petitioner: In re: Roger Shekar
Case Number: 26-1074
Filed: April 2, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2026 MOTION [2174827] to vacate filed by Roger Shekar (Service Date: 05/26/2026 by US Mail) Length Certification: Petitioner Certify that the document complies with F.R.A.P. and D.C. Circuit Local Rules as to page and word limit.. [26-1074] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 05/26/2026 07:26 AM]
May 15, 2026 PETITION [2173689] for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Roger Shekar [Service Date: 05/15/2026 by US Mail] Length Certification: Petitioner certify that bteh document complies with teh F.R.A.P. and D.C. Circuit Court Local Rule as to page and word limit. [26-1074] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 05/15/2026 03:40 PM]
May 15, 2026 PETITION [2173697] for writ of mandamus lodged by Petitioner Roger Shekar [Service Date: 05/15/2026 by US Mail] Length Certification: Petitioner certifies that the document complies with F.R.A.P and D.C. Circuit Local Rules including a motion to grant leave to file oversized petition instanter. [26-1074]--[MODIFIED EVENT FROM FILED TO LODGED--Edited 05/18/2026 by LMM] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 05/15/2026 03:53 PM]
May 15, 2026 UNOPPOSED MOTION [2173703] to exceed word limits in motion filed by Roger Shekar [Service Date: 05/15/2026 ] Length Certification: Petitioner certify that the document complies with the F.R.A.P and D.C.Circuit Local Rules as to word and page limit. [26-1074] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 05/15/2026 03:57 PM]
May 14, 2026 PETITION [2173262] Emergency Motion To Vacate ; Petition for Criminal Sanctions on Clerks Cislak, Atchue, Lestrade filed by Petitioner Roger Shekar [Service Date: 05/14/2026 by US Mail] Length Certification: Petitioner certify that the document complies with F.R.A.P ;D.C. Circuit Rules in word limit /page limit. [26-1074] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 05/14/2026 08:27 AM]
May 13, 2026 LETTER [2173448] sent to Petitioner [26-1074]. [Entered: 05/14/2026 03:18 PM]
May 13, 2026 CLERK'S ORDER [2173194] filed dismissing as moot petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus and motion to exceed page limits [ # 2172892-2 ]; [ # 2172968-2 ]. [26-1074] [Entered: 05/13/2026 04:17 PM]
May 12, 2026 UNOPPOSED MOTION [2172968] to exceed page limits in motion filed by Roger Shekar [Service Date: 05/12/2026 ] Length Certification: Petitioner certifies that the document filed complies with F.R.A.P and the Local Rules of D.C, Circuit Court of Appeals in in word and page limit.. [26-1074] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 05/12/2026 01:35 PM]
May 12, 2026 PETITION [2172892] for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Roger Shekar [Service Date: 05/12/2026 by US Mail] Length Certification: The Petitioner Certify that the document submitted complies with the F.R.A.P and Local Rules of the D.C Circuit as to pages and word count. [26-1074] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 05/12/2026 10:38 AM]
May 1, 2026 PER CURIAM ORDER [2171517] filed ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [2168462-2] be granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus [ # 2167150-2 ] and writ of prohibition [ # 2167150-3 ] be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for injunctive relief [ # 2167539-2 ] be dismissed as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for criminal contempt and sanctions [ # 2169305-2 ] be denied. Before Judges: Walker, Childs and Garcia. [26-1074] [Entered: 05/01/2026 04:01 PM]
April 18, 2026 PETITION [2169305] filed by Petitioner Roger Shekar [Service Date: 04/18/2026 by US Mail] Length Certification: This filing complies with the Circuit Rules and F.R.A.P. as to page and word limitations. [26-1074] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 04/18/2026 10:25 AM]
April 14, 2026 MOTION [2168462] to waive docketing fee filed by Roger Shekar (Service Date: 04/14/2026 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 3 Pages. [26-1074]--[Edited 04/15/2026 by EBL--Modified Event] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 04/14/2026 05:38 AM]
April 8, 2026 PETITION [2167539] for injunction and TRO filed by Petitioner Roger Shekar [Service Date: 04/08/2026 by US Mail] Length Certification: I certify that the Word and Page limit of the Petition complies with the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure as to the Petition. [26-1074] (Shekar, Roger) [Entered: 04/08/2026 07:14 AM]
April 6, 2026 CLERK'S ORDER [2167153] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. PETITIONER payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 05/06/2026, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-1074] [Entered: 04/06/2026 09:09 AM]
April 2, 2026 AGENCY ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [26-1074] [Entered: 04/06/2026 09:00 AM]
April 2, 2026 PETITION [2167150] for writ of mandamus, for writ of prohibition filed by Petitioner Roger Shekar [Service Date: 04/06/2026 by Clerk, US Mail] Length Certification: 34 Pages. [26-1074] [Entered: 04/06/2026 09:03 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Roger Shekar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: Roger Shekar
Represented By: Roger Shekar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?