NLRB v. Blue Tarp reDevelopment, LLC
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Blue Tarp reDevelopment, LLC, d/b/a MGM Springfield
Case Number: 26-1089
Filed: April 15, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2026 DOCKETING STATEMENT [2176368] filed by Blue Tarp reDevelopment, LLC in 26-1082, 26-1089 [Service Date: 06/01/2026 ] [26-1082, 26-1089] (Trimmer, Paul) [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:10 PM]
June 2, 2026 STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2176379] filed by Blue Tarp reDevelopment, LLC in 26-1082, 26-1089 [Service Date: 06/02/2026 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [26-1082, 26-1089] (Trimmer, Paul) [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:25 PM]
June 1, 2026 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2176145] filed by Blue Tarp reDevelopment, LLC in 26-1082, 26-1089 [Service Date: 06/01/2026 ] [26-1082, 26-1089] (Trimmer, Paul) [Entered: 06/01/2026 04:28 PM]
June 1, 2026 STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2176186] filed by Blue Tarp reDevelopment, LLC in 26-1082, 26-1089 [Service Date: 06/01/2026 ] [26-1082, 26-1089] (Trimmer, Paul) [Entered: 06/01/2026 05:26 PM]
May 28, 2026 CERTIFIED INDEX TO RECORD [2175418] filed by NLRB in 26-1082, 26-1089 [Service Date: 05/28/2026 ] [26-1082, 26-1089] (Burdick, Ruth) [Entered: 05/28/2026 11:36 AM]
May 27, 2026 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2175202] filed by Ruth E. Burdick and co-counsel Michelle Fujii on behalf of Petitioner NLRB in 26-1089, Respondent NLRB in 26-1082. [26-1089, 26-1082] (Fujii, Michelle) [Entered: 05/27/2026 01:07 PM]
May 5, 2026 STATEMENT [2171846] with Disclosure Listing filed by UNITE HERE in 26-1082 [Service Date: 05/05/2026 ] [26-1082, 26-1089] (McKissock, Paige) [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:33 PM]
May 4, 2026 MOTION [2171755] for leave to intervene [Disclosure Listing: Not Attached] filed by UNITE HERE [Service Date: 05/04/2026 ] [26-1082, 26-1089]--[Edited 05/05/2026 by LMM] (McKissock, Paige) [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:10 PM]
April 16, 2026 CERTIFIED COPY [2168933] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 2168931-2 ] [26-1089] [Entered: 04/16/2026 09:17 AM]
April 16, 2026 CLERK'S ORDER [2168936] filed consolidating cases 26-1089 (Cross-appeal started 04/16/2026) with 26-1082 [26-1082, 26-1089] [Entered: 04/16/2026 09:27 AM]
April 15, 2026 CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT CASE docketed. [26-1089] [Entered: 04/16/2026 09:15 AM]
April 15, 2026 CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT [2168931] of a decision by federal agency filed by NLRB [Service Date: 04/16/2026 ] [26-1089] [Entered: 04/16/2026 09:17 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: NLRB v. Blue Tarp reDevelopment, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Represented By: Usha Dheenan
Represented By: Ruth E. Burdick
Represented By: Michelle Fujii
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Blue Tarp reDevelopment, LLC, d/b/a MGM Springfield
Represented By: Jeremy S. Schneider
Represented By: Paul Theodore Trimmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?