Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. EPA, et al
| Environmental Defense Fund and Environmental Integrity Project |
| Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Zeldin, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
| Domestic Energy Producers Alliance |
| 26-1096 |
| April 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2177562] filed granting motion to hold case in abeyance [ # 2175007-2 ]. Case 26-1096 held in abeyance pending further order of the court; directing EPA to file abeyance status reports at 60-day intervals beginning 08/07/2026; directing parties to file motions to govern within 30 days of EPA's final action on the remainder of the proposed rule. [26-1096] [Entered: 06/08/2026 05:10 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [2175006] filed by Environmental Defense Fund and Environmental Integrity Project [Service Date: 05/26/2026 ] [26-1096] (LaMair, Edwin) [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:10 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2175005] filed by Environmental Defense Fund and Environmental Integrity Project [Service Date: 05/26/2026 ] [26-1096] (LaMair, Edwin) [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:06 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [2175007] to hold case in abeyance filed by Environmental Defense Fund and Environmental Integrity Project [Service Date: 05/26/2026 ] Length Certification: 684 Words. [26-1096] (LaMair, Edwin) [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:14 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2175008] filed by Environmental Defense Fund and Environmental Integrity Project [Service Date: 05/26/2026 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [26-1096] (LaMair, Edwin) [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:16 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2175010] filed by Environmental Defense Fund and Environmental Integrity Project [Service Date: 05/26/2026 ] [26-1096] (LaMair, Edwin) [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:17 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [2175011] submitted by Environmental Defense Fund and Environmental Integrity Project [Service Date: 05/26/2026 ] [26-1096] (LaMair, Edwin) [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:18 PM] |
| MOTION [2175095] for leave to intervene [Disclosure Listing: Attached] filed by Domestic Energy Producers Alliance [Service Date: 05/26/2026 ] [26-1096]--[Edited 05/28/2026 by FAW] (Seby, Paul) [Entered: 05/26/2026 05:47 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2170811] filed by Daniel J. Martin on behalf of Respondents EPA and Lee M. Zeldin. [26-1096] (Martin, Daniel) [Entered: 04/28/2026 12:38 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [2170312] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 2170310-2 ] [26-1096] [Entered: 04/24/2026 01:00 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2170313] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 05/26/2026. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 05/26/2026. PETITIONER statement of issues due 05/26/2026. PETITIONER underlying decision due 05/26/2026. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 05/26/2026. PETITIONER procedural motions due 05/26/2026. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 06/08/2026; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 05/26/2026. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 05/26/2026. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 06/08/2026. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 06/08/2026 [26-1096] [Entered: 04/24/2026 01:02 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [26-1096] [Entered: 04/24/2026 12:59 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [2170310] of a decision by federal agency filed by Environmental Defense Fund and Environmental Integrity Project [Service Date: 04/23/2026 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [26-1096] [Entered: 04/24/2026 01:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
