Sunflower State Industrial Railway v. STB, et al
Petitioner: Sunflower State Industrial Railway
Respondent: Surface Transportation Board and United States of America
Case Number: 26-1126
Filed: May 20, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2026 JOINT MOTION [2181883] to dismiss case filed by STB and USA (Service Date: 07/06/2026 by US Mail, Email, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 747 words. [26-1126] (Kress, Adam) [Entered: 07/06/2026 01:51 PM]
June 30, 2026 CERTIFIED INDEX TO RECORD [2181177] filed by STB [Service Date: 06/30/2026 ] [26-1126] (Kress, Adam) [Entered: 06/30/2026 11:57 AM]
June 25, 2026 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2180494] filed by Shana Wallace on behalf of Respondent USA. [26-1126] (Wallace, Shana) [Entered: 06/25/2026 03:28 PM]
June 3, 2026 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2176454] filed by Adam M. Kress on behalf of Respondent STB. [26-1126] (Kress, Adam) [Entered: 06/03/2026 09:23 AM]
June 2, 2026 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2176345] filed by Robert J. Wiggers on behalf of Respondent USA. [26-1126] (Wiggers, Robert) [Entered: 06/02/2026 02:14 PM]
June 1, 2026 RESPONSE [2176374] to order [ # 2174455-4 ] filed by Sunflower State Industrial Railway (Service Date: 06/02/2026 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 11 pages. [26-1126] [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:17 PM]
May 26, 2026 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2174943] filed by Robert Nicholson on behalf of Respondent USA. [26-1126] (Nicholson, Robert) [Entered: 05/26/2026 12:17 PM]
May 21, 2026 CERTIFIED COPY [2174441] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 2174423-2 ] [26-1126] [Entered: 05/21/2026 12:58 PM]
May 21, 2026 CLERK'S ORDER [2174455] filed directing petitioner to either (1) have counsel enter an appearance in this case or (2) show cause why the case should not be dismissed. Response to Order due 06/22/2026. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. [26-1126] [Entered: 05/21/2026 01:22 PM]
May 20, 2026 PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [26-1126] [Entered: 05/21/2026 12:02 PM]
May 20, 2026 PETITION FOR REVIEW [2174423] of a decision by federal agency filed by Sunflower State Industrial Railway [Service Date: 05/21/2026 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Attached. [26-1126] [Entered: 05/21/2026 12:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sunflower State Industrial Railway v. STB, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sunflower State Industrial Railway
Represented By: Sunflower State Industrial Railway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Surface Transportation Board
Represented By: Adam M. Kress
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Robert J. Wiggers
Represented By: Shana Marie Wallace
Represented By: Robert B. Nicholson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?