In re: Rebecca Duval
| In re: Rebecca Joann Duval |
| 26-1234 |
| September 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2192601] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. PETITIONER payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 10/13/2026, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-1234] [Entered: 09/11/2026 03:00 PM] |
| US CIVIL ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [26-1234] [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:53 PM] |
| EMERGENCY PETITION [2192591] for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Rebecca Joann Duval [Service Date: 09/09/2026 by Clerk, US Mail] Length Certification: 7 Pages. [26-1234] [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:55 PM] |
| MOTION [2192594] to permit pro se electronic filing status filed by Rebecca Joann Duval (Service Date: 09/09/2026 by US Mail, Clerk) Length Certification: 2 Pages. [26-1234] [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Rebecca Duval | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Rebecca Joann Duval | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Joann Duval |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
