Ryan Bonneau v. USA, et al
| Ryan Bonneau, also known as Mittson Bonnyes |
| United States of America, Joe Biden, Donald J. Trump, Central Intelligence Agency and United States Secret Service |
| 26-5056 |
| February 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2185810] filed referring motion ifp in district court [ # 2185804-2 ] to the district court for consideration, holding case in abeyance. Case 26-5056 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:25cv2654-UNA from U.S. District Court; The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order and the original motion to the district court. [26-5056] [Entered: 07/30/2026 09:55 AM] |
| LETTER [2185800] filed by Ryan Bonneau [Service Date: 07/30/2026 ] [26-5056] [Entered: 07/30/2026 09:39 AM] |
| RESPONSE [2185799] to order [ # 2158909-4 ] filed by Ryan Bonneau (Service Date: 07/30/2026 by CM/ECF NDA, Clerk) Length Certification: 6 pages. [26-5056] [Entered: 07/30/2026 09:37 AM] |
| NOTICE [2185801] filed by Ryan Bonneau [Service Date: 07/30/2026 ] [26-5056] [Entered: 07/30/2026 09:40 AM] |
| PRISONER TRUST ACCOUNT REPORT [2185802] filed by Ryan Bonneau [26-5056] [Entered: 07/30/2026 09:41 AM] |
| PRISONER CONSENT TO COLLECTION [2185803] filed by Ryan Bonneau [26-5056] [Entered: 07/30/2026 09:42 AM] |
| MOTION [2185804] leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court filed by Ryan Bonneau [Service Date: 07/30/2026 ] Length Certification: 7 pages. [26-5056] [Entered: 07/30/2026 09:43 AM] |
| MOTION [2185805] to appoint counsel and for other relief filed by Ryan Bonneau [Service Date: 07/30/2026 ] Length Certification: 14 pages. [26-5056] [Entered: 07/30/2026 09:46 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2181005] filed resending and extending Clerk order [ # 2158909-4 ]; Response to Order now due 07/29/2026. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5056] [Entered: 06/29/2026 03:36 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2181013] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 07/29/2026; directing party to file ifp prisoner submissions: APPELLANT prisoner trust account report due 07/29/2026. APPELLANT consent to collection form due 07/29/2026. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5056] [Entered: 06/29/2026 03:54 PM] |
| LETTER [2181025] sent to warden sending Clerk orders [ # 2181013-3 ], [ # 2181005-3 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 07/29/2026. [26-5056] [Entered: 06/29/2026 04:13 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5056] [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:42 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2158900] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-02654-UNA filed by Ryan Bonneau. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5056. [26-5056] [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:45 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2158903] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 03/16/2026, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5056] [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:49 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2158909] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 03/16/2026. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order., Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5056] [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
