Edson Gardner v. Douglas Burgum
| Edson Gardner, As Personal Representative of the Fee Estate of Carma C. Reed Gardner |
| Douglas Burgum, Secretary of the Interior |
| 26-5129 |
| April 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [2177498] to motion to extend time [ # 2175755-2 ] filed by Edson Gardner [Service Date: 06/08/2026 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 3 pages. [26-5129] [Entered: 06/08/2026 03:00 PM] |
| MOTION [2176649] for interlocutory appeal filed by Edson Gardner (Service Date: 06/04/2026 by US Mail, Clerk) Length Certification: 3 Pages. [26-5129] [Entered: 06/04/2026 08:22 AM] |
| MOTION [2175755] to extend time to file motion to 07/06/2026 filed by Douglas Burgum (Service Date: 05/29/2026 by US Mail, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: This document complies with the type-volume limit of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(d)(2) because, excluding the parts of the motion exempted under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(a)(2)(B), this document contains 304 words.. [26-5129] (Carter, Margot) [Entered: 05/29/2026 01:30 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2175632] filed by Margot Carter on behalf of Appellee Douglas Burgum. [26-5129] (Carter, Margot) [Entered: 05/29/2026 08:25 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [2175001] filed by Edson Gardner [Service Date: 05/26/2026 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [26-5129] [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:52 PM] |
| NOTICE [2174772] of denial of motion for reconsideration filed by Edson Gardner [Service Date: 05/22/2026 ] [26-5129] [Entered: 05/22/2026 04:37 PM] |
| NOTICE [2174458] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court : Amended Notice of Appeal [2174458-2] [26-5129] [Entered: 05/21/2026 01:35 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2174257] filed by Amber Blaha on behalf of Appellee Douglas Burgum. [26-5129] (Blaha, Amber) [Entered: 05/20/2026 02:38 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2174260] filed by Douglas Burgum [Service Date: 05/20/2026 ] [26-5129] (Blaha, Amber) [Entered: 05/20/2026 02:40 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2173501] filed by Edson Gardner [Service Date: 05/08/2026] [26-5129] [Entered: 05/14/2026 06:24 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2173504] filed by Edson Gardner. [26-5129] [Entered: 05/14/2026 06:33 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [2173503] filed by Edson Gardner [Service Date: 05/08/2026 ] [26-5129] [Entered: 05/14/2026 06:33 PM] |
| NOTICE [2172468] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for payment of docketing fee [Case Number 26-5129: Fee Paid] [26-5129] [Entered: 05/08/2026 01:55 PM] |
| NOTICE [2172683] filed by Edson Gardner [Service Date: 05/11/2026 ] [26-5129] [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:09 AM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [2173487] filed by Edson Gardner [Service Date: 04/28/2026] [26-5129] [Entered: 05/14/2026 05:49 PM] |
| APPELLANT BRIEF [2171872] filed by Edson Gardner [Service Date: 05/05/2026 ] Length of Brief: 17 Pages. [26-5129] [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:35 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2169687] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:24-cv-02546-RC filed by Edson Gardner. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5129. [26-5129] [Entered: 04/21/2026 01:53 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2169690] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/21/2026. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/21/2026. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/21/2026. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/21/2026. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/21/2026. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 05/21/2026. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/21/2026. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/21/2026. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/05/2026; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/21/2026. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/21/2026. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/21/2026. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/05/2026, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5129] [Entered: 04/21/2026 01:56 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2169689] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 05/21/2026, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5129] [Entered: 04/21/2026 01:54 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5129] [Entered: 04/21/2026 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Edson Gardner v. Douglas Burgum | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edson Gardner, As Personal Representative of the Fee Estate of Carma C. Reed Gardner | |
| Represented By: | Edson Gardner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Douglas Burgum, Secretary of the Interior | |
| Represented By: | Johnny Hillary Walker III |
| Represented By: | Margot L. Carter |
| Represented By: | Amber Beth Blaha |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
