Timothy Young v. Todd Blanche, et al
| Timothy Doyle Young |
| Pamela J. Bondi, William M. Blier, O.I.G., Ian Conners, United States Department of Justice, United States of America and Todd Blanche |
| 26-5168 |
| May 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE [2179424] to order [ # 2174083-5 ] filed by Timothy Doyle Young (Service Date: 06/18/2026 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2 pages. [26-5168] [Entered: 06/18/2026 10:54 AM] |
| RECEIPT [2180018] received from Timothy Young [signed for on 06/08/2026] for documents [ # 2174089-2 ] sent to [26-5168] [Entered: 06/23/2026 12:46 PM] |
| US PRISONER CASE docketed. [26-5168] [Entered: 05/19/2026 12:18 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2174081] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:24-cv-00880-UNA filed by Timothy Doyle Young. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5168. [26-5168] [Entered: 05/19/2026 12:19 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2174083] filed to show cause regarding payment of docketing fee. Response to Order due 06/18/2026. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [26-5168] [Entered: 05/19/2026 12:21 PM] |
| LETTER [2174089] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 2174083-5 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 06/18/2026. [26-5168] [Entered: 05/19/2026 12:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
