Ruben Santoyo v. USA, et al
| Ruben Santoyo |
| United States of America, Virginia M. Kendall, in her official capacity as Chief Judge and Chair of the Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and Robert J. Conrad, Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in official capacity |
| 26-5174 |
| May 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPENDIX [2181722] filed by Mr. Ruben Santoyo [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 07/02/2026 ] [26-5174] (Santoyo, Ruben) [Entered: 07/03/2026 12:00 AM] |
| APPELLANT BRIEF [2180741] filed by Mr. Ruben Santoyo [Service Date: 06/27/2026 ] Length of Brief: 2,800 Words. [26-5174] (Santoyo, Ruben) [Entered: 06/27/2026 11:38 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5174] [Entered: 05/22/2026 11:06 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2174620] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:26-cv-00251-UNA filed by Mr. Ruben Santoyo. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5174. [26-5174] [Entered: 05/22/2026 11:07 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2174622] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 07/13/2026. APPENDIX due 07/13/2026. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5174] [Entered: 05/22/2026 11:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ruben Santoyo v. USA, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ruben Santoyo | |
| Represented By: | Ruben Santoyo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Johnny Hillary Walker III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Virginia M. Kendall, in her official capacity as Chief Judge and Chair of the Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert J. Conrad, Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
