National Treasury Employees Union, et al v. Russell Vought, et al
| National Treasury Employees Union, National Consumer Law Center, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Virginia Poverty Law Center, CFPB Employee Association and Ted Steege |
| Russell T. Vought, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau |
| Borealis S. Hedling |
| 26-5220 |
| June 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutes APA/Review Agency |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5220] [Entered: 06/10/2026 08:42 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2177989] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-00381-ABJ filed by Borealis S. Hedling. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5220. [26-5220] [Entered: 06/10/2026 08:46 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2177990] filed directing party to file payment of docketing fee APPELLANT payment of docketing fee due 07/10/2026; directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis APPELLANT motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 07/10/2026. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5220] [Entered: 06/10/2026 08:56 AM] |
| NOTICE [2178019] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court to supplement record (6/9/2026 Order denying Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis) [26-5220] [Entered: 06/10/2026 10:46 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2178141] filed by Derek Weiss on behalf of Appellees CFPB and Russell T. Vought. [26-5220] (Weiss, Derek) [Entered: 06/10/2026 04:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
