Vincent Cannady v. Heather Shade, et al
| Vincent Cannady and Vernon Copeland |
| Heather Shade, (VA VR&E Director), Federal Bureau of Prisons, (BOP), Metropolitan Detention Center - Brooklyn, (MDC BROOKLYN), Raul Maldanado, Current MDC Warden, Director of the U.S. Marshals Service, United States Attorney General/ DOJ Headquarters, Casey Michael Clark, AUSA, Kyndryl, Inc., Experis, (ManpowerGroup Subsidiary), ManpowerGroup, (Parent company), Bialor, Dr., Apn Gershon, Corrections Officer #1, #2, Daniel A. Hochheiser, (CJA Counsel), Sylvester James, "Sly", Winsor Park Rehabilitation Center, (Queens NY) and Murrt, Mr.; K Unit Manager at MDC Brooklyn |
| 26-5245 |
| June 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2189054] filed considering order [ # 2180812-4 ] and dismissing case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate on 10/05/2026. [26-5245] [Entered: 08/19/2026 06:30 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5245] [Entered: 06/29/2026 10:21 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2180810] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-03363-CRC filed by Vincent Cannady. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5245. [26-5245] [Entered: 06/29/2026 10:22 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2180812] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 07/29/2026, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5245] [Entered: 06/29/2026 10:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.