Fernando Fontanez v. Donald Trump
| Fernando Fontanez |
| Donald J. Trump, President |
| 26-5267 |
| July 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUPPLEMENT [2192607] to Appellant/Petitioner brief [ # 2190105-2 ] filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 09/11/2026 ] [26-5267] [Entered: 09/11/2026 03:06 PM] |
| THIRD SUPPLEMENT [2190711] to Appellant/Petitioner brief [ # 2190105-2 ] filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 08/31/2026 ] [26-5267] [Entered: 08/31/2026 02:28 PM] |
| AMENDED APPELLANT BRIEF [2190105] filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 08/26/2026 ] Length of Brief: 87 pages. [26-5267] [Entered: 08/26/2026 04:12 PM] |
| NOTICE [2189097] filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 08/20/2026 ] [26-5267] [Entered: 08/20/2026 10:42 AM] |
| SECOND SUPPLEMENT [2187766] to Appellant/Petitioner brief [ # 2186048-2 ] filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 08/12/2026 ] [26-5267] [Entered: 08/12/2026 07:39 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2187247] filed granting motion to permit pro se electronic filing [ # 2186042-2 ] [26-5267] [Entered: 08/07/2026 05:08 PM] |
| SUPPLEMENT [2186812] to Appellant/Petitioner brief [ # 2186048-2 ] filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 08/05/2026 ] [26-5267] [Entered: 08/05/2026 04:49 PM] |
| MOTION [2186032] to appoint counsel filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 07/31/2026 ] Length Certification: 1 page. [26-5267] [Entered: 07/31/2026 10:24 AM] |
| NOTICE [2186036] regarding in forma pauperis status in the district court [Case Number 26-5267: IFP] filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 07/31/2026 ] [26-5267] [Entered: 07/31/2026 10:30 AM] |
| MOTION [2186042] to permit pro se electronic filing status filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 07/31/2026 ] Length Certification: 1 page. [26-5267] [Entered: 07/31/2026 10:35 AM] |
| APPELLANT BRIEF AND SUPPLEMENTS [2186048] filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez [Service Date: 07/31/2026 ] Length of Brief: 80 pages. [26-5267] [Entered: 07/31/2026 10:39 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5267] [Entered: 07/16/2026 10:24 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2183479] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:26-cv-01687-UNA filed by Mr. Fernando Fontanez. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5267. [26-5267] [Entered: 07/16/2026 10:24 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2183483] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 09/04/2026. APPENDIX due 09/04/2026. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5267] [Entered: 07/16/2026 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fernando Fontanez v. Donald Trump | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fernando Fontanez | |
| Represented By: | Fernando Fontanez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Donald J. Trump, President | |
| Represented By: | Johnny Hillary Walker III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
