Andre Bland, et al v. Todd Blanche, et al
| Andre Bland, Urshawn Miller, Howard Hawk Willis, Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee and Federal Public Defender for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Todd Blanche, in his official government capacity and United States Department of Justice |
| 26-5305 |
| August 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5305] [Entered: 08/27/2026 11:25 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2190212] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-03499-APM filed by Andre Bland, Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Federal Public Defender for the Middle of Tennessee, Urshawn Miller and Howard Hawk Willis. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5305. [26-5305] [Entered: 08/27/2026 11:26 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2190214] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT statement of issues due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT underlying decision due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT transcript status report due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT procedural motions due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 10/13/2026; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 09/28/2026. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 09/28/2026. APPELLEE procedural motions due 09/28/2026. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 10/13/2026 [26-5305] [Entered: 08/27/2026 11:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
