Tohono O'odham Nation v. Markwayne Mullin, et al
| Tohono O'odham Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe |
| Markwayne Mullin, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Rosario Vasquez, in his official capacity as Chief of U.S. Border Patrol |
| 26-5306 |
| August 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Torts to Land |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5306] [Entered: 08/27/2026 11:23 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2190207] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:26-cv-02127-RJL filed by Tohono O'odham Nation. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5306. [26-5306] [Entered: 08/27/2026 11:23 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2190211] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT statement of issues due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT underlying decision due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT transcript status report due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT procedural motions due 09/28/2026. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 10/13/2026; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 09/28/2026. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 09/28/2026. APPELLEE procedural motions due 09/28/2026. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 10/13/2026 [26-5306] [Entered: 08/27/2026 11:26 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [2190339] to expedite case filed by Tohono O'odham Nation [Service Date: 08/27/2026 ] Length Certification: 2077 words. [26-5306] (Kanji, Riyaz) [Entered: 08/27/2026 11:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tohono O'odham Nation v. Markwayne Mullin, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tohono O'odham Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe | |
| Represented By: | Riyaz A. Kanji |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Markwayne Mullin, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security | |
| Represented By: | DOJ Appellate Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection | |
| Represented By: | DOJ Appellate Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rosario Vasquez, in his official capacity as Chief of U.S. Border Patrol | |
| Represented By: | DOJ Appellate Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
