Pao Tatneft v. Ukraine
Petitioner: Pao Tatneft
Respondent: Ukraine, c/o Mr. Pavlo Petrenko, Minister of Justice
Case Number: 26-7042
Filed: April 7, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes Arbitration
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2026 CLERK'S ORDER [2174564] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 06/30/2026. APPENDIX due 06/30/2026. APPELLEE Brief due on 07/30/2026. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 08/20/2026. [26-7042] [Entered: 05/21/2026 06:16 PM]
May 12, 2026 PER CURIAM ORDER [2172891] filed ORDERED that the motion to expedite [ # 2167533-2 ] be denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, while not otherwise limited, the parties address in their briefs whether the court has jurisdiction over this appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1291. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the alternative request for a writ of mandamus and the request for security [ # 2167533-3 ] be referred to the merits panel to which this case is assigned. The Clerk is directed to enter a briefing schedule. Before Judges: Henderson, Pillard and Rao. [26-7042] [Entered: 05/12/2026 10:38 AM]
May 7, 2026 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2172332] filed by Ukraine [Service Date: 05/07/2026 ] [26-7042] (Shaw, Robert) [Entered: 05/07/2026 05:13 PM]
May 7, 2026 STATEMENT [2172324] with Disclosure Listing filed by Pao Tatneft [Service Date: 05/07/2026 ] [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/07/2026 04:58 PM]
May 6, 2026 STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2172057] filed by Pao Tatneft [Service Date: 05/06/2026 ] [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/06/2026 01:06 PM]
May 6, 2026 TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [2172073] filed by Pao Tatneft [Service Date: 05/06/2026 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/06/2026 01:47 PM]
May 6, 2026 UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [2172064] submitted by Pao Tatneft [Service Date: 05/06/2026 ] [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/06/2026 01:22 PM]
May 6, 2026 STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2172063] filed by Pao Tatneft [Service Date: 05/06/2026 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/06/2026 01:15 PM]
May 6, 2026 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2172052] filed by Pao Tatneft [Service Date: 05/06/2026 ] [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/06/2026 12:53 PM]
May 6, 2026 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2172047] filed by Elizabeth Wolstein on behalf of Appellant Pao Tatneft. [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/06/2026 12:37 PM]
April 22, 2026 REPLY [2169946] filed by Pao Tatneft to response [ # 2168873-2 ] [Service Date: 04/22/2026 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 2,598 Words. [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 04/22/2026 06:27 PM]
April 15, 2026 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [2168873] to motion to expedite case [ # 2167533-2 ] filed by Ukraine [Service Date: 04/15/2026 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 2,284 words. [26-7042] (Shaw, Robert) [Entered: 04/15/2026 04:51 PM]
April 15, 2026 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2168869] filed by Robert Michael Shaw on behalf of Appellee Ukraine. [26-7042] (Shaw, Robert) [Entered: 04/15/2026 04:48 PM]
April 7, 2026 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2167453] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:17-cv-00582-CKK filed by Pao Tatneft. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-7042. [26-7042] [Entered: 04/07/2026 01:05 PM]
April 7, 2026 MOTION [2167533] to expedite or for writ of mandamus filed by Pao Tatneft (Service Date: 04/07/2026 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 4,953 words. [26-7042]--[Edited 05/12/2026 by SRG] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 04/07/2026 09:02 PM] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 04/07/2026 09:02 PM]
April 7, 2026 DOCKETING STATEMENT [2167532] filed by Pao Tatneft [Service Date: 04/07/2026 ] [26-7042] (Wolstein, Elizabeth) [Entered: 04/07/2026 08:35 PM]
April 7, 2026 CLERK'S ORDER [2167454] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/07/2026. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/07/2026. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/07/2026. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/07/2026. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/07/2026. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 05/07/2026. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/07/2026. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/07/2026. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 05/22/2026; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/07/2026. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/07/2026. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/07/2026. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 05/22/2026 [26-7042] [Entered: 04/07/2026 01:07 PM]
April 7, 2026 PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-7042] [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pao Tatneft v. Ukraine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pao Tatneft
Represented By: Elizabeth Wolstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ukraine, c/o Mr. Pavlo Petrenko, Minister of Justice
Represented By: Robert Michael Shaw Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?