Aaron Rabel v. City of Pasadena, TX
| Aaron Blake Rabel |
| City of Pasadena, TX |
| 26-7058 |
| April 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-7058] [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:29 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2171169] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:26-cv-00859-UNA filed by Aaron Blake Rabel. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-7058. [26-7058] [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:30 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2171173] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 06/22/2026. APPENDIX due 06/22/2026, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-7058] [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Aaron Rabel v. City of Pasadena, TX | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aaron Blake Rabel | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Blake Rabel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Pasadena, TX | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
