Carmela Sciabarra, et al v. DTLR, et al
| Carmela A. Sciabarra and Livia M. Scotto |
| DTLR, Toyota Motor Cars and Ally Bank |
| 26-7126 |
| June 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2188345] filed considering Clerk order [ # 2181534-3 ], dismissing case for lack of prosecution, withholding issuance of the mandate. [26-7126] [Entered: 08/14/2026 02:32 PM] |
| NOTICE [2181517] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is granted [Case Number 26-7126: IFP] [26-7126] [Entered: 07/02/2026 10:37 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2181534] filed removing case from abeyance; to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 08/03/2026. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-7126] [Entered: 07/02/2026 11:27 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-7126] [Entered: 06/22/2026 09:53 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2179674] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-01793-UNA filed by Livia M. Scotto. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-7126. [26-7126] [Entered: 06/22/2026 09:54 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2179678] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 26-7126 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:25cv1793-UNA from U.S. District Court; The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [26-7126] [Entered: 06/22/2026 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
