Christopher Moree v. Georgetown University, et al
| Christopher Moree |
| John Partridge, DR. and Georgetown University |
| 26-7225 |
| November 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-7225] [Entered: 11/04/2026 01:46 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2201820] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-01415-RDM filed by Christopher Moree. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-7225. [26-7225] [Entered: 11/04/2026 01:47 PM] |
| LETTER [2201823] sent regarding attorney membership to Michael Brody for Georgetown University and John Partridge. Application for Admission due 12/04/2026. [26-7225] [Entered: 11/04/2026 01:48 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2201827] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 12/04/2026. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 12/04/2026. APPELLANT statement of issues due 12/04/2026. APPELLANT underlying decision due 12/04/2026. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 12/04/2026. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 12/04/2026. APPELLANT transcript status report due 12/04/2026. APPELLANT procedural motions due 12/04/2026. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 12/21/2026; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 12/04/2026. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 12/04/2026. APPELLEE procedural motions due 12/04/2026. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 12/21/2026, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-7225] [Entered: 11/04/2026 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
