OHIO CELLULAR V ADAMS USA
| Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Cross Appellant: |
ADAMS USA, INC. |
| Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee: |
APEHEAD MANUFACTURING, INC. |
| Third Party Defendant-Appellant: |
DONALD E. NELSON |
| Third Party Defendant-Appellee: |
JAMES E. LAMMY, SR., PATRICK J. ARNOLD, JR., ROBERT F. RYWALSKI and ROBERT FIESELER |
| Plaintiff-Appellant: |
OHIO CELLULAR PRODUCTS CORPORATION |
| Case Number: |
02-1079 |
| Filed: |
November 26, 2001 |
| Court: |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Nature of Suit: |
Other |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: OHIO CELLULAR V ADAMS USA |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant/third party plaintiff-cross appellant: ADAMS USA, INC. |
| Represented By: |
WHEAT, JACK ALLEN |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant/third party plaintiff-appellee: APEHEAD MANUFACTURING, INC. |
| Represented By: |
WHEAT, JACK ALLEN |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Third party defendant-appellant: DONALD E. NELSON |
| Represented By: |
DEESE, JAMES L. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Third party defendant-appellee: JAMES E. LAMMY, SR. |
| Represented By: |
WICKLUND, DAVID W. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Third party defendant-appellee: PATRICK J. ARNOLD, JR. |
| Represented By: |
SATULLO, NICHOLAS D. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Third party defendant-appellee: ROBERT F. RYWALSKI |
| Represented By: |
GILMER, JR., ROBERT J. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Third party defendant-appellee: ROBERT FIESELER |
| Represented By: |
SATULLO, NICHOLAS D. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Plaintiff-appellant: OHIO CELLULAR PRODUCTS CORPORATION |
| Represented By: |
DEESE, JAMES L. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
