UNIV OF ROCHESTER V GD SEARLE & CO
Amicus Curiae: ELI LILLY & COMPANY, THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER and THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER DALLAS
Defendant-Appellee: G.D. SEARLE & CO., INC., MONSANTO COMPANY, PFIZER INC. and PHARMACIA CORPORATION
Plaintiff-Appellant: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
Case Number: 03-1304
Filed: March 10, 2003
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: UNIV OF ROCHESTER V GD SEARLE & CO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: ELI LILLY & COMPANY
Represented By: KELLEY, JAMES J.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Represented By: FURNISS, DANIEL J.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
Represented By: FURNISS, DANIEL J.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER DALLAS
Represented By: FURNISS, DANIEL J.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant-appellee: G.D. SEARLE & CO., INC.
Represented By: BAECHTOLD, ROBERT L.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant-appellee: MONSANTO COMPANY
Represented By: BAECHTOLD, ROBERT L.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant-appellee: PFIZER INC.
Represented By: SOBEL, GERALD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant-appellee: PHARMACIA CORPORATION
Represented By: BAECHTOLD, ROBERT L.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff-appellant: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
Represented By: DODSON, GERALD P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?