Lakeshore Engineering Services v. US
UNITED STATES |
LAKESHORE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. |
13-5094 |
May 17, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 Mandate issued to the United States Court of Federal Claims. Costs taxed in the amount of $492.00. Service: 06/02/2014 by clerk. [158112] |
Filing 39 Bill of Costs for Appellee US. Service: 04/17/2014 by email. Objection to Bill of Costs due on 05/05/2014. [148668] |
Filing 38 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed. The judgment or decision is: Affirmed. (Precedential Opinion). (For the Court: Newman,Circuit Judge; Prost,Circuit Judge and Taranto,Circuit Judge). [147450] |
Filing 37 Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT by Phil B. Abernethy for Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. and Ms. Patricia M. McCarthy for US. Panel: Judge: Newman , Judge: Prost , Judge: Taranto. [127778] |
Filing 36 Response to oral argument order from the Appellee US designating Patricia M. McCarthy as arguing attorney. Service: 11/22/2013 by email Designated time for argument: 15 minutes. Designated time for rebuttal: 0 minutes. [118844] |
Filing 35 Response to oral argument order from the Appellee US designating Patricia M. McCarthy as arguing attorney. Service: 11/22/2013 by email Designated time for argument: undecided minutes. Designated time for rebuttal: undecided minutes. [118842] |
Filing 34 Entry of appearance for Patricia M. McCarthy as of counsel for Appellee US. Service: 11/22/2013 by email. [118841] |
Filing 33 Response to oral argument order from the Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. designating Phil B. Abernethy as arguing attorney. Service: 11/21/2013 by email Designated time for argument: 12 minutes. Designated time for rebuttal: 3 minutes. [118726] |
Filing 32 NOTICE OF CALENDARING. Panel: 1401G. Case scheduled Jan 08, 2014 10:00 a.m. at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717 Madison Place, N.W. Washington, DC 20439), Courtroom 201. Response to oral argument order due: 12/16/2013. Counsel should check-in 30 minutes prior to the opening of the session. Please review the # Oral Argument Order. [118537] [13-5094, 13-5088, 13-1074, 13-5091] |
Filing 31 6 paper copies of Volumes 1 - 4 of the appendix . [ # 29 ] received from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. [111974] |
Filing 30 6 paper copies of the 3rd brief Brief [ # 28 ] received from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. [110842] |
Filing 29 APPENDIX FILED for Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. [ # 27 ], [ # 26 ], [ # 25 ], [ # 24 ]. Title: AGREED APPENDIX PREPARED PURSUANT TO FED. R. APP. P. 30 AND FED. CIR. R. 30 , [Non-Confidential version only]. Number of Pages: 1200. Service: 10/15/2013 by email.. Pursuant to ECF-10, filer is directed to file six copies of the brief in paper format. The paper copies of the brief should be received by the court on or before 10/21/2013. [110638] |
Filing 27 TENDERED from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Title: JOINT APPENDIX. Service: 10/15/2013 by email. [110028] |
Filing 26 TENDERED from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Title: JOINT APPENDIX. Service: 10/15/2013 by email. [110023] |
Filing 25 TENDERED from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Title: JOINT APPENDIX. Service: 10/15/2013 by email. [110019] |
Filing 24 TENDERED from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Title: JOINT APPENDIX. Service: 10/15/2013 by email. [110014] |
Filing 28 BRIEF FILED for Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. [ # 23 ]. Title: Reply Brief of Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc., [Non-Confidential version only]. Number of Pages: 29. Service: 10/10/2013 by email.. Pursuant to ECF-10, filer is directed to file six copies of the brief in paper format. The paper copies of the brief should be received by the court on or before 10/21/2013. Appendix is due 10/17/2013. [110604] |
Filing 23 TENDERED from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Title: REPLY BRIEF. Service: 10/10/2013 by email. [109533] |
Filing 22 ORDER granting motion to extend time to file reply brief [ # 21 ] filed by Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. reply brief is due 10/10/2013. Service: 09/18/2013 by clerk. [104543] |
Filing 21 MOTION of Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. to extend the time to 10/10/2013 to file the reply brief. Response/Opposition is due 09/30/2013 [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 09/17/2013 by email. [104086] |
Filing 20 6 paper copies of the 2nd brief Brief [ # 19 ] received from Appellee US. [103112] |
Filing 19 BRIEF FILED for Appellee US [ # 18 ]. Title: BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, THE UNITED STATES , [Non-Confidential version only]. Number of Pages: 64. Service: 09/09/2013 by email.. Pursuant to ECF-10, filer is directed to file six copies of the brief in paper format. The paper copies of the brief should be received by the court on or before 09/16/2013. Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. reply brief is due 09/26/2013. [102546] |
Filing 18 TENDERED from Appellee US. Title: OPENING BRIEF. Service: 09/09/2013 by email. [102270] |
Filing 17 6 paper copies of the 1st brief Brief [ # 16 ] received from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. [97406] |
Filing 16 BRIEF FILED for Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. [ # 15 ]. Title: Corrected Brief of Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc., [Non-Confidential version only]. Number of Pages: 59. Service: 08/07/2013 by email. Pursuant to ECF-10, filer is directed to file six copies of the brief in paper format. The paper copies of the brief should be received by the court on or before 08/13/2013. [97005] |
Filing 15 TENDERED from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Title: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF. Service: 08/07/2013 by email. [96718] |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF REJECTION: The brief of Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc., Brief of appellant lakeshore engineering services, inc. [ # 13 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court and is therefore rejected for filing. Brief due 08/21/2013. Appellee United States brief is due 09/12/2013. [96612] |
Filing 13 TENDERED from Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Title: OPENING BRIEF. Service: 07/30/2013 by email. [95102] This brief is rejected. See Doc No. [ # 14 ] |
Filing 12 ORDER granting motion to extend time to file appellant's principal brief [ # 11 ] filed by Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. Brief due 07/30/2013. Service: 07/03/2013 by clerk. [89617] |
Filing 11 MOTION of Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. to extend the time to 07/30/2013 to file the appellant/petitioner's principal brief. Response/Opposition is due 07/15/2013 [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 07/02/2013 by email. [89400] |
Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Service: 06/17/2013 by email. [86553] |
Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellee US. Service: 06/17/2013 by email. [86526] |
Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Phil B. Abernethy as principal counsel for Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Service: 05/29/2013 by email. [82194] |
Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for the Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Service: 05/28/2013 by email. [81480] |
Filing 6 Entry of appearance for LeAnn W. Nealey as of counsel for Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Service: 05/28/2013 by email. [81479] |
Filing 5 Notice of Rejection to Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc., the following document(s) cannot be filed: [ # 3 ] attorney entry of appearance. Reason(s) The document does not contain a certificate of service., [ # 4 ] certificate of interest. Reason(s) The document does not contain a certificate of service. A completed certificate of Interest must be submitted in accordance with Fed. Cir. R. 47.4 by 06/11/2013. Service: 05/28/2013 by clerk. |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for the Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Service: 05/28/2013 by email. [81417] This document has been rejected. See Doc No. [ # 5 ] |
Filing 3 Entry of appearance for LeAnn W. Nealey as of counsel for Appellant Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.. Service: 05/28/2013 by email. [81414] This document has been rejected. See Doc No. [ # 5 ] |
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Jane Chang Dempsey as principal counsel for Appellee US. Service: 05/21/2013 by email. [79656] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/16/2013. [78606] Entry of Appearance due 05/31/2013. Certificate of Interest is due on 05/31/2013. Docketing Statement due 06/17/2013. Appellant/Petitioner's brief is due 07/16/2013. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Lakeshore Engineering Services v. US | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES | |
Represented By: | Jane C. Dempsey Esq. |
Represented By: | Patricia M. McCarthy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: LAKESHORE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. | |
Represented By: | Phil B. Abernethy |
Represented By: | LeAnn W. Nealey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.