Vehicle Operation Technologies v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff / Appellant: VEHICLE OPERATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, State Street Corporation
Case Number: 14-1832
Filed: September 17, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER filed. The motions for reconsideration [ # 270782-2 ] [ # 7 ] [ # 270784-2 ] [ # 270785-2 ] [ # 270786-2 ] [ # 270787-2 ] are denied. All pending motions [ # 270782-3 ] [ # 7 ] [ # 270784-3 ] [ # 270785-3 ] [ # 270786-3 ] [ # 270787-3 ] [ # 281506-2 ] are denied as moot. Service: 12/22/2015 by clerk. [298203] [14-1831, 14-1832, 14-1833, 14-1835, 14-1836, 14-1837, 15-1003, 15-1004, 15-1005] [LMS] [Entered: 12/22/2015 02:18 PM]
September 10, 2015 Filing 8 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re: motion to reopen appeal Docket No. [ # 270787-2 ], motion to reopen appeal Docket No. [ # 270786-2 ], motion to reopen appeal Docket No. [ # 270785-2 ], motion to reopen appeal Docket No. [ # 270784-2 ], motion to reopen appeal Docket No. [ # 7 ], motion to reopen appeal Docket No. [ # 270782-2 ], ERROR: In cases consolidated by the court, documents should be filed in the lead appeal only. Additionally, when a motion requests multiple reliefs, multiple reliefs should be selected in CM/ECF. CORRECTION: No further action is required. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [270809] [14-1831, 14-1832, 14-1833, 14-1835, 14-1836, 14-1837] [IW] [Entered: 09/10/2015 07:33 AM]
September 9, 2015 Filing 7 CORRECTED ENTRY: MOTION of Buether Joe & Carpenter, LLC Eric W. Buether to reopen appeal, to modify the official caption, and to lift stay. [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 09/09/2015 by email. [270783] --[Edited 09/10/2015 by IW - Reason: to add additional reliefs] [Eric Buether] [Entered: 09/09/2015 07:29 PM]
July 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting motions to dismiss appeal nos. 2014-1831, 2014-1832, and 2015-1003 [ # 257432-2 ] [ # 257632-2 ]. 2014-1831, 2014-1832, and 2015-1003 are dismissed. Each party shall bear its own costs in 2014-1831, 2014-1832, and 2015-1003. The revised official caption for 2014-1837 et al. is reflected in the order. ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2014-1831, 2014-1832, 2015-1003 only): July 21, 2015. Service: 07/21/2015 by clerk. [257934] [14-1831, 15-1003, 14-1832, 14-1837, 15-1005] [LMS] [Entered: 07/21/2015 09:50 AM]
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting motion to stay proceedings [ # 197323-2 ] filed by Cross-Appellants Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc., BMW of North America LLC, Nissan North America, Inc., Appellees Porsche Cars North America, Inc., General Motors LLC, Ford Motor Company and Appellant Vehicle Operation Technologies, LLC. The briefing schedule is stayed. Within 14 days of the issuance of the district court's order on the 35 U.S.C. 285 motions, the parties are directed to inform the court of how they believe these appeals should proceed.; and denying as moot motion to extend time to file appellant's principal brief [ # 195671-2 ] filed by Appellant Vehicle Operation Technologies, LLC. Service: 02/19/2015 by clerk. [218312] [14-1831, 14-1832, 14-1833, 14-1837, 15-1003, 15-1005] [LMS] [Entered: 02/19/2015 10:13 AM]
September 24, 2014 Filing 4 Note to file: The following cases are associated: LEAD APPEAL 14-1831 with consolidated appeals 14-1832, -1833, -1835, -1836, -1837. FURTHER ENTRIES WILL BE ADDED TO THE LEAD APPEAL ONLY. [184939] [14-1831, 14-1832, 14-1833, 14-1835, 14-1836, 14-1837] [AT] [Entered: 09/24/2014 08:23 AM]
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER consolidating appeals (14-1831, -1832, -1833, -1835, -1836, -1837); Appellant's brief is due 11/17/2014. Service as of this date by Clerk of Court. [184925] [14-1831, 14-1832, 14-1833, 14-1835, 14-1836, 14-1837] [AT] [Entered: 09/24/2014 08:12 AM]
September 17, 2014 Filing 2 Amended Notice of Appeal for Vehicle Operation Technologies, LLC. Service: 09/16/2014 by email. [184052] [VDW] [Entered: 09/19/2014 02:40 PM]
September 17, 2014 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/16/2014. [183253] Entry of Appearance due 10/01/2014. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/01/2014. Docketing Statement due 10/01/2014. Appellant/Petitioner's brief is due 11/17/2014. [SW] [Entered: 09/17/2014 08:59 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vehicle Operation Technologies v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VEHICLE OPERATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Represented By: Stephen Brauerman Esq.
Represented By: Eric William Buether
Represented By: Brian Andrew Carpenter
Represented By: Christopher Michael Joe Esq.
Represented By: Richard D. Kirk Esq.
Represented By: Vanessa Ribeiro Tiradentes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, State Street Corporation
Represented By: Eric Allan Buresh Esq.
Represented By: Jason R. Mudd
Represented By: Benjamin Schladweiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?