Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
| GILBERT P. HYATT |
| ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office |
| 19-1039 |
| October 5, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Official caption revised to reflect Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Katherine K. Vidal as Appellant. (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [843091] [18-2390, 18-2391, 18-2392, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1049, 19-1070] [MVH] [Entered: 04/14/2022 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 PARTIAL JUDGMENT. VACATED-IN-PART AND REMANDED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: No Costs. Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click # here . [777765] [18-2390, 18-2391, 18-2392, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1049, 19-1070]--[Edited 06/07/2021 by MJL to reflect that this is a partial judgment] [MVH] [Entered: 06/01/2021 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 OPINION filed for the court by Reyna, Circuit Judge; Wallach, Circuit Judge and Hughes, Circuit Judge. Precedential Opinion. [777764] [18-2390, 18-2391, 18-2392, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1049, 19-1070] [MVH] [Entered: 06/01/2021 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 Official caption revised to reflect Andrew Hirshfeld, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as appellant (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [751033] [18-2390, 18-2391, 18-2392, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1049, 19-1070] [JAL] [Entered: 01/22/2021 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Note to file: The following cases are associated:18-2390 (lead) with 19-1038 (cross-appeal to 18-2392) & 19-1039 (cross-appeal to 18-2391). FURTHER ENTRIES WILL BE ADDED TO THE LEAD APPEAL ONLY. [555232] [18-2390, 19-1038, 19-1039, 18-2391, 18-2392] [SJ] [Entered: 10/05/2018 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/04/2018. [555228] . [SJ] [Entered: 10/05/2018 12:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Cross appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT | |
| Represented By: | Andrew M. Grossman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office | |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Krause |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office | |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Krause |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office | |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Krause |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
