Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. v. Ultraproof, Inc.
Defendant: DOES, 1 though 10, inclusive
Defendant / Appellee: ENDLISS TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California corporation, ULTRAPROOF, INC., a California corporation and ULTRAPROOF, INC., a Nevada corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD., a Republic of Korea corporation
Case Number: 19-1435
Filed: January 18, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 17, 2020 Summary Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. v. Ultraproof, Inc.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER filed. The motions [ # 587211-2 ] [ # 29 ] are granted. Service: 02/28/2019 by clerk. [589455] [19-1292, 19-1435] [LS] [Entered: 02/28/2019 02:29 PM]
February 27, 2019 Filing 31 Notice from Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. regarding postjudgment motions. Service: 02/27/2019 by email. [589201] [19-1435] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 02/27/2019 07:52 PM]
February 25, 2019 Filing 30 RESPONSE of Appellee Ultraproof, Inc. to the clerk order for expedited response or reply [ # 28 ] , clerk order [ # 28 ]. Service: 02/25/2019 by email. [588519] [19-1435] [Edward Bishop] [Entered: 02/25/2019 07:17 PM]
February 21, 2019 Filing 29 MOTION of Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. to extend the time to a date 60 days after the District Court rules on two pending motions [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 02/21/2019 by email. [587787] [19-1435] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 02/21/2019 06:01 PM]
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER filed. Within three days from the date of filing of this order, Ultraproof, Inc. and Endliss Technology, Inc. are directed to inform this court whether they oppose the motion [ # 587211-2 ]. Service: 02/21/2019 by clerk. [587704] [19-1292, 19-1435] [LS] [Entered: 02/21/2019 03:12 PM]
February 19, 2019 Filing 27 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc.. Service: 02/19/2019 by email. [587248] [19-1435] [Edward Bishop] [Entered: 02/19/2019 07:45 PM]
February 19, 2019 Filing 26 Certificate of Interest for the Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc.. Service: 02/19/2019 by email. [587246] [19-1435] [Edward Bishop] [Entered: 02/19/2019 07:44 PM]
February 19, 2019 Filing 25 Entry of appearance for Edward L. Bishop as principal counsel for Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc.. Service: 02/19/2019 by email. [587244] [19-1435] [Edward Bishop] [Entered: 02/19/2019 07:41 PM]
February 14, 2019 Filing 24 Notice to counsel for Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc., Ultraproof, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc.: The record of this case indicates that the Entry of Appearance for the principal counsel has not been filed. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [585947] [MMA] [Entered: 02/14/2019 01:35 PM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 23 Corrected Docketing Statement for the Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc.. Service: 02/13/2019 by email. [585676] [19-1435] [James Jagoda] [Entered: 02/13/2019 03:17 PM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 22 Corrected Certificate of Interest for the Appellees Ultraproof, Inc. and Endliss Technology, Inc.. Service: 02/13/2019 by email. [585675] [19-1435] [James Jagoda] [Entered: 02/13/2019 03:15 PM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 21 Corrected Entry of appearance for James J. Jagoda as of counsel for Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc.. Service: 02/13/2019 by email. [585674] [19-1435] [James Jagoda] [Entered: 02/13/2019 03:13 PM]
February 8, 2019 Filing 20 Corrected Entry of appearance for Jean M. Kim as of counsel for Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 02/08/2019 by email. [584643] [19-1435] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 02/08/2019 08:23 PM]
February 7, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd., Entry of Appearance - J. Kim [ # 17 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 02/14/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court.[583987] [JAL] [Entered: 02/07/2019 10:05 AM]
February 7, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc., Ultraproof, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc., Entry of Appearance - J. Jagoda; Certificate of Interest; Docketing Statement [ # 14 ], [ # 15 ], [ # 16 ], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents due on 02/14/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court.[583984] [JAL] [Entered: 02/07/2019 09:58 AM]
February 6, 2019 Filing 17 Entry of appearance for Jean M. Kim as of counsel for Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 02/06/2019 by email. [583773] [19-1435] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 19 ] [Jean Kim] [Entered: 02/06/2019 01:01 PM]
February 5, 2019 Filing 16 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Ultraproof, Inc. and Endliss Technology, Inc.. Service: 02/05/2019 by email. [583618] [19-1435] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 18 ] [James Jagoda] [Entered: 02/05/2019 05:15 PM]
February 5, 2019 Filing 15 Certificate of Interest for the Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc.. Service: 02/05/2019 by email. [583616] [19-1435] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 18 ] [James Jagoda] [Entered: 02/05/2019 05:13 PM]
February 5, 2019 Filing 14 Entry of appearance for James J. Jagoda as of counsel for Appellees Endliss Technology, Inc. and Ultraproof, Inc.. Service: 02/05/2019 by email. [583613] [19-1435] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 18 ] [James Jagoda] [Entered: 02/05/2019 05:12 PM]
February 4, 2019 Filing 13 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re:attorney entry of appearance Docket No. [ # 11 ], ERROR: (1) Attorney Josephine Brosas is not a registered CM/ECF filer for the Federal Circuit. (2) The contact information contained on the entry of appearance does not match the contact information in the attorney's user account. CORRECTION: (1) Pursuant to FCR 25(a)(2), attorneys who appear before this court must register for the court's CM/ECF system. Please register promptly. (2) Please update as needed to ensure the contact information on the entry of appearance and in the user account matches. [583294] [MMA] [Entered: 02/04/2019 04:37 PM]
February 4, 2019 Filing 12 Note to file: 19-1435 (COMPANION started 02/04/2019) with 19-1292. These cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel for oral argument. [583106] [19-1292, 19-1435] [JAL] [Entered: 02/04/2019 12:38 PM]
February 1, 2019 Filing 11 Corrected Entry of appearance for Josephine Brosas as of counsel for Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 02/01/2019 by email. [582942] [19-1435] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 02/01/2019 08:57 PM]
January 28, 2019 Filing 10 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re:attorney entry of appearance Docket No. [ # 7 ], ERROR: The contact information listed on the entry of appearance for Brian G. Arnold does not match the information on the attorney's user account. CORRECTION: Please update as needed to ensure that the contact information on the entry of appearance and the user account matches. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [581312] [JAL] [Entered: 01/28/2019 10:14 AM]
January 25, 2019 Filing 9 Corrected Certificate of Interest for the Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 01/25/2019 by email. [581190] [19-1435] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 01/25/2019 06:40 PM]
January 25, 2019 Filing 8 Corrected Docketing Statement for the Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 01/25/2019 by email. [581189] [19-1435] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 01/25/2019 06:38 PM]
January 25, 2019 Filing 7 Corrected Entry of appearance for Brian G. Arnold as principal counsel for Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 01/25/2019 by email. [581188] [19-1435] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 01/25/2019 06:33 PM]
January 25, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd., Entry of Appearance - J. Brosas [ # 4 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 02/01/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court.[580912]--[Edited 01/25/2019 by MJL to correct reasons for non-compliance] [JAL] [Entered: 01/25/2019 10:57 AM]
January 25, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd., Entry of Appearance - B. Arnold [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 02/01/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court.[580910] [JAL] [Entered: 01/25/2019 10:53 AM]
January 24, 2019 Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Josephine A. Brosas as of counsel for Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 01/24/2019 by email. [580826] [19-1435] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 6 ] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 01/24/2019 07:48 PM]
January 24, 2019 Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Joshua D. Curry as of counsel for Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 01/24/2019 by email. [580825] [19-1435] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 01/24/2019 07:45 PM]
January 24, 2019 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Brian G. Arnold as principal counsel for Appellant Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.. Service: 01/24/2019 by email. [580824] [19-1435] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 5 ] [Brian Arnold] [Entered: 01/24/2019 07:33 PM]
January 18, 2019 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 01/17/2019. [579397] Entry of Appearance due 02/01/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 02/01/2019. Docketing Statement due 02/01/2019. Appellant's brief is due 03/19/2019. [JAL] [Entered: 01/18/2019 03:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. v. Ultraproof, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES, 1 though 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ENDLISS TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California corporation
Represented By: Edward L. Bishop
Represented By: James Jagoda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ULTRAPROOF, INC., a California corporation
Represented By: Edward L. Bishop
Represented By: James Jagoda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ULTRAPROOF, INC., a Nevada corporation
Represented By: Edward L. Bishop
Represented By: James Jagoda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD., a Republic of Korea corporation
Represented By: Josephine Brosas
Represented By: Jean Kim
Represented By: Brian G. Arnold
Represented By: Joshua David Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?