Apple Inc. v. California Institute of Tech.
Appellant: APPLE INC.
Appellee: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Case Number: 19-1580
Filed: February 22, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 5, 2020 APPLE INC. v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECH.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2019 Filing 18 Certified list from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Service: 04/03/2019 by email. Appellant's brief is due 06/03/2019 in 19-1580. [597550] [19-1580, 19-1581] [MMA] [Entered: 04/03/2019 12:24 PM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 17 Docketing Statement for the Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591654] [19-1580] [Michael Rosato] [Entered: 03/08/2019 05:54 PM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 16 Certificate of Interest for the Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591653] [19-1580] [Michael Rosato] [Entered: 03/08/2019 05:49 PM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 15 Entry of appearance for Richard Torczon as of counsel for Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591651] [19-1580] [Michael Rosato] [Entered: 03/08/2019 05:48 PM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 14 Entry of appearance for Matthew A. Argenti as of counsel for Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591650] [19-1580] [Michael Rosato] [Entered: 03/08/2019 05:44 PM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 13 Entry of appearance for Michael T. Rosato as principal counsel for Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591649] [19-1580] [Michael Rosato] [Entered: 03/08/2019 05:42 PM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 12 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re: docketing statement Docket No. [ # 11 ], ERROR: The designation of California Institute of Technology as Cross-Appeallant does not match the designation on the official caption for this appeal. CORRECTION: The official caption can be found on the docket report. Please ensure future documents include the short caption or the official caption. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [591507] [MMA] [Entered: 03/08/2019 01:51 PM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 11 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591337] [19-1580] [Mark Selwyn] [Entered: 03/08/2019 08:46 AM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 10 Certificate of Interest for the Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591336] [19-1580] [Mark Selwyn] [Entered: 03/08/2019 08:45 AM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 9 Entry of appearance for Russell A. Spivak as of counsel for Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591334] [19-1580] [Russell Spivak] [Entered: 03/08/2019 08:43 AM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Michael H. Smith as of counsel for Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591331] [19-1580] [Michael Smith] [Entered: 03/08/2019 08:41 AM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 7 Entry of appearance for James M. Dowd as of counsel for Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591330] [19-1580] [James Dowd] [Entered: 03/08/2019 08:39 AM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 6 Entry of appearance for Lauren B. Fletcher as of counsel for Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591329] [19-1580] [Lauren Fletcher] [Entered: 03/08/2019 08:37 AM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Mark C. Fleming as of counsel for Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591328] [19-1580] [Mark Fleming] [Entered: 03/08/2019 08:36 AM]
March 8, 2019 Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Mark D. Selwyn as principal counsel for Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591324] [19-1580] [Mark Selwyn] [Entered: 03/08/2019 08:33 AM]
March 1, 2019 Filing 3 Note to file: The following cases are associated:19-1580 Lead with 19-1581 Member Case. FURTHER ENTRIES WILL BE ADDED TO THE LEAD APPEAL ONLY. [589567] [19-1580, 19-1581] [MMA] [Entered: 03/01/2019 10:26 AM]
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER consolidating appeals (19-1580 with 19-1581). The certified lists are due 04/03/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [589566] [19-1580, 19-1581] [MMA] [Entered: 03/01/2019 10:24 AM]
February 22, 2019 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 02/22/2019. [588100] Entry of Appearance due 03/08/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 03/08/2019. Docketing Statement due 03/08/2019. Certified List due on 04/03/2019. [MMA] [Entered: 02/22/2019 04:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Apple Inc. v. California Institute of Tech.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: APPLE INC.
Represented By: Michael H. Smith
Represented By: Lauren B. Fletcher
Represented By: Mark D. Selwyn
Represented By: Russell Spivak
Represented By: James Murphy Dowd
Represented By: Mark Christopher Fleming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Represented By: Michael T. Rosato
Represented By: Matthew A. Argenti
Represented By: Richard Torczon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?