Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp.
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION |
NEVRO CORP. |
19-1584 |
February 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Certified list from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Service: 04/04/2019 by email. Appellant's brief is due 06/03/2019. [598069] [JAL] [Entered: 04/05/2019 11:09 AM] |
Filing 11 Entry of appearance for Matthew M. Wolf as principal counsel for Appellant Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation. Service: 03/11/2019 by email. [591973] [19-1584] [Matthew Wolf] [Entered: 03/11/2019 04:03 PM] |
Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation. Service: 03/11/2019 by email. [591961] [19-1584] [David Caine] [Entered: 03/11/2019 03:51 PM] |
Filing 9 Certificate of Interest for the Appellant Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation. Service: 03/11/2019 by email. [591959] [19-1584] [David Caine] [Entered: 03/11/2019 03:49 PM] |
Filing 8 Entry of appearance for David A. Caine as of counsel for Appellant Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation. Service: 03/11/2019 by email. [591955] [19-1584] [David Caine] [Entered: 03/11/2019 03:47 PM] |
Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Ching-Lee Fukuda as of counsel for Appellee Nevro Corp.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591477] [19-1584] [Jon Wright] [Entered: 03/08/2019 12:50 PM] |
Filing 6 Entry of appearance for Sharon Lee as of counsel for Appellee Nevro Corp.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591476] [19-1584] [Jon Wright] [Entered: 03/08/2019 12:49 PM] |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for the Appellee Nevro Corp.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591470] [19-1584] [Jon Wright] [Entered: 03/08/2019 12:38 PM] |
Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Nevro Corp.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591469] [19-1584] [Jon Wright] [Entered: 03/08/2019 12:37 PM] |
Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Jon E. Wright as principal counsel for Appellee Nevro Corp.. Service: 03/08/2019 by email. [591465] [19-1584] [Jon Wright] [Entered: 03/08/2019 12:36 PM] |
Filing 2 Note to file: 19-1584 (COMPANION started 03/04/2019) with 19-1582. These cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel for oral argument. [589942] [19-1582, 19-1584] [JAL] [Entered: 03/04/2019 09:33 AM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 02/22/2019. [588250] Entry of Appearance due 03/11/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 03/11/2019. Docketing Statement due 03/11/2019. Certified List due on 04/08/2019. [JAL] [Entered: 02/25/2019 09:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | David A. Caine |
Represented By: | Matthew Wolf |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: NEVRO CORP. | |
Represented By: | Ching-Lee Fukuda |
Represented By: | Sharon Lee |
Represented By: | Jon Wright |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.