Rutila v. Department of Transportation
HAROLD EDWARD RUTILA, IV |
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION |
19-1712 |
March 29, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
RUTILA v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Clerk's Note to the File: Harold Edward Rutila, IV's formal opening brief is due 06/28/2019. [607455] [MJL] [Entered: 05/15/2019 10:44 AM] |
Filing 11 Notice from Harold Edward Rutila, IV of intent to file formal brief. Service: 05/06/2019 by US mail. [607450] [MJL] [Entered: 05/15/2019 10:38 AM] |
Filing 10 Certified list from the Merit Systems Protection Board. Service: 04/26/2019 by US mail. Petitioner's informal brief is due 05/20/2019. [603307] [MJL] [Entered: 04/26/2019 02:03 PM] |
Filing 9 This entry was made in error and has been removed from the docket. Entry of appearance. [601168]--[Edited 04/18/2019 by MJL to partially delete] [MJL] [Entered: 04/18/2019 09:37 AM] |
Filing 8 Statement Concerning Discrimination pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) for Harold Edward Rutila, IV. Service: 04/09/2019 by US mail. [600126] [MJL] [Entered: 04/15/2019 01:04 PM] |
Filing 7 Corrected entry of appearance for Harold E. Rutila, IV as pro se. Service: 04/09/2019 by US mail. [600125] [MJL] [Entered: 04/15/2019 01:04 PM] |
Filing 6 Entry of appearance for Domenique Kirchner as principal counsel for Respondent Department of Transportation. Service: 04/12/2019 by US mail. [599801] [19-1712] [Domenique Kirchner] [Entered: 04/12/2019 04:11 PM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Harold Edward Rutila, IV (Entry of Appearance [ # 2 ], Statement Concerning Discrimination [ # 3 ]) are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents due 04/24/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [599022] [MJL] [Entered: 04/10/2019 02:21 PM] |
Filing 3 Statement Concerning Discrimination pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) for Harold Edward Rutila, IV. Service: 04/10/2019 by clerk. [599014]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [ # 5 ]. [MJL] [Entered: 04/10/2019 02:13 PM] |
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Harold E. Rutila IV as pro se. Service: 04/10/2019 by clerk. [599010]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [ # 5 ]. [MJL] [Entered: 04/10/2019 02:10 PM] |
Filing 4 Fee paid on 03/15/2019. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: 569610000239. [599018] [MJL] [Entered: 04/10/2019 02:18 PM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 03/15/2019. [596540] Fee/IFP due 04/12/2019. 15(c) due 04/12/2019. Entry of Appearance due 04/12/2019. Certified List due 05/08/2019. [MJL] [Entered: 03/29/2019 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Rutila v. Department of Transportation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: HAROLD EDWARD RUTILA, IV | |
Represented By: | Harold Edward Rutila IV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION | |
Represented By: | Domenique Grace Kirchner Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.