Johnson v. USPS
| WADRA E. JOHNSON |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE |
| 19-1818 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED INFORMAL BRIEF FILED for Petitioner Wadra E. Johnson. Number of Pages: 2. Service: 06/27/2019 by clerk. [617382] --[compliance review complete - Edited 06/27/2019 by SMJ] [SMJ] [Entered: 06/27/2019 10:47 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER filed. The briefing schedule is stayed. The parties are directed to respond within 21 days from the date of filing of this order as to whether the cases should be transferred to federal district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631, and which court that should be. (Per Curiam). Service: 06/13/2019 by clerk. [613891] [19-1815, 19-1818] [LS] [Entered: 06/13/2019 12:24 PM]
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Petitioner Wadra E. Johnson, Informal Brief [ # 5 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document is due on 06/20/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [612186] [JAL] [Entered: 06/06/2019 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION of Petitioner Wadra E. Johnson for leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis. Service: 06/06/2019 by clerk. [612181] [JAL] [Entered: 06/06/2019 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 6 Statement Concerning Discrimination pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) for Petitioner Wadra E. Johnson. Service: 06/06/2019 by clerk. [612176] [JAL] [Entered: 06/06/2019 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 FILED from Petitioner Wadra E. Johnson. Title: INFORMAL BRIEF. Service: 06/06/2019 by clerk. [612171] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 8 ] [JAL] [Entered: 06/06/2019 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Wadra Johnson as pro se for Petitioner Wadra E. Johnson. Service: 06/06/2019 by clerk. [612164] [JAL] [Entered: 06/06/2019 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certified list from the Merit Systems Protection Board. Service: 05/15/2019 by US mail. Appellant/Petitioner's Informal brief is due 06/10/2019. [607710] [SMJ] [Entered: 05/15/2019 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 Note to file: 19-1818 (COMP COMPANION started 05/07/2019) with 19-1815. These cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel for oral argument. [605539] [19-1815, 19-1818] [SMJ] [Entered: 05/07/2019 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 04/25/2019. [603887] Fee/IFP due on 05/14/2019. 15(c) due on 05/14/2019. Entry of Appearance due 05/14/2019. Certified List due on 06/10/2019. [SMJ] [Entered: 04/30/2019 09:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Johnson v. USPS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: WADRA E. JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Wadra E. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
