Agility Public Warehousing Co. v. US
| AGILITY PUBLIC WAREHOUSING COMPANY K.S.C.P. |
| UNITED STATES |
| 19-1887 |
| May 17, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Note to file: The following cases are associated:19-1886 (lead) with 19-1887 (consolidated). FURTHER ENTRIES WILL BE ADDED TO THE LEAD APPEAL ONLY. [608209] [19-1886, 19-1887] [SMJ] [Entered: 05/17/2019 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/16/2019. [608207] . [SMJ] [Entered: 05/17/2019 02:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Agility Public Warehousing Co. v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: AGILITY PUBLIC WAREHOUSING COMPANY K.S.C.P. | |
| Represented By: | Derek L. Shaffer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | William James Grimaldi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
