Holmes v. USPS
| MCKENZIE HOLMES |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE |
| 19-1973 |
| June 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Homes v. United States Postal Service
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/03/2019. [611973] Fee/IFP due on 06/20/2019. 15(c) due on 06/20/2019. Entry of Appearance due 06/20/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/20/2019. Docketing Statement due 07/08/2019. Certified List due on 07/16/2019. [SMJ] [Entered: 06/06/2019 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Holmes v. USPS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MCKENZIE HOLMES | |
| Represented By: | Steven H. Jesser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
