Lee v. US
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIN HANG LEE
Case Number: 19-2060
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 7, 2020 LEE v. US

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2019 Filing 16 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re: motion to extend time to file brief Docket No. [ # 14 ], ERROR: Appellant Sin Hang Lee's motion did not include a certificate of compliance regarding the word count. CORRECTION: Pursuant to FRAP 32(g)(1), motions must contain a certificate of compliance regarding the word count. Please ensure future motions include this certificate. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [628925] [CAB] [Entered: 08/16/2019 12:20 PM]
August 16, 2019 Filing 15 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 14 ] filed by Appellant Sin Hang Lee. The opening brief is due 09/06/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [628923] [CAB] [Entered: 08/16/2019 12:17 PM]
August 15, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION of Appellant Sin Hang Lee to extend the time to 09/06/2019 to file the Preliminary Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant. [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 08/15/2019 by email. [628745] [19-2060] [Mary Leonhardt] [Entered: 08/15/2019 10:16 PM]
August 6, 2019 Filing 13 Corrected Entry of appearance for Heather Huntley as of counsel for Appellee US. Service: 08/06/2019 by email. [626248] [19-2060] [Heather Huntley] [Entered: 08/06/2019 11:21 AM]
July 29, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee US, Entry of Appearance - H. Huntley [ # 10 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document is due on 08/05/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [624050] [JAL] [Entered: 07/29/2019 11:58 AM]
July 24, 2019 Filing 11 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Sin Hang Lee. Service: 07/24/2019 by email. [623345] [19-2060] [Mary Leonhardt] [Entered: 07/24/2019 09:37 PM]
July 23, 2019 Filing 10 Entry of appearance for Heather Huntley as of counsel for Appellee US. Service: 07/23/2019 by email. [622976] [19-2060] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 12 ] [Heather Huntley] [Entered: 07/23/2019 04:39 PM]
July 16, 2019 Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellee US. Service: 07/16/2019 by email. [621210] [19-2060] [Borislav Kushnir] [Entered: 07/16/2019 09:39 AM]
July 9, 2019 Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Sin Hang Lee. Service: 07/09/2019 by email. [619704] [19-2060] [Mary Leonhardt] [Entered: 07/09/2019 10:05 AM]
July 8, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Sin Hang Lee, Certificate of Interest [ # 4 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document is due on 07/15/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [619581] [JAL] [Entered: 07/08/2019 03:45 PM]
July 8, 2019 Filing 6 REMINDER : All counsel of record are reminded of their responsibility per Fed. Cir. R. 47.4(a) and Fed. Cir. R. 47.3 to promptly submit an amended Certificate of Interest (COI) and/or Entry of Appearance (EOA) as information changes during the pendency of the appeal. Failure to comply with these Rules may delay the timely processing of your case or result in adverse action. [619573] [JAL] [Entered: 07/08/2019 03:42 PM]
July 8, 2019 Filing 5 Transcript Purchase Order Form for the Appellant Sin Hang Lee indicating that a request is made to the reporter for a transcript. Service: 07/08/2019 by email. [619546] [19-2060] [Mary Leonhardt] [Entered: 07/08/2019 03:22 PM]
July 8, 2019 Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Sin Hang Lee. Service: 07/08/2019 by email. [619543] [19-2060] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 7 ] [Mary Leonhardt] [Entered: 07/08/2019 03:20 PM]
July 8, 2019 Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Mary Alice Moore Leonhardt, Esq. as principal counsel for Appellant Sin Hang Lee. Service: 07/08/2019 by email. [619541] [19-2060] [Mary Leonhardt] [Entered: 07/08/2019 03:17 PM]
June 25, 2019 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Borislav Kushnir as principal counsel for Appellee US. Service: 06/25/2019 by email. [616612] [19-2060] [Borislav Kushnir] [Entered: 06/25/2019 08:51 AM]
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/21/2019. [616409] Entry of Appearance is due 07/08/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 07/08/2019. Docketing Statement is due 07/24/2019. Appellant's brief is due 08/23/2019. [JAL] [Entered: 06/24/2019 02:37 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lee v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Borislav Kushnir
Represented By: Heather Huntley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SIN HANG LEE
Represented By: Mary Alice Moore Leonhardt Esq.
Represented By: Mary Alice Leonhardt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?