JHO Intellectual PropertyIn re: JHO Intellectual Property
ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office |
In re: JHO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC |
19-2330 |
August 29, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 08/23/2019. [631826] Fee/IFP due on 09/12/2019. Entry of Appearance due 09/12/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 09/12/2019. Docketing Statement due 09/30/2019. Certified List due on 10/08/2019. [TAM] [Entered: 08/29/2019 09:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: JHO Intellectual PropertyIn re: JHO Intellectual Property | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office | |
Represented By: | Thomas W. Krause |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: In re: JHO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC | |
Represented By: | Geoffrey A. Zelley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.