Rothschild Connected Devices v. Coca-Cola Company
| ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES INNOVATIONS, LLC |
| THE COCA-COLA COMPANY |
| 19-2393 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting motion to dismiss Appeal No. 19-2393 pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant Coca-Cola Company. Each side shall bear its own costs. ISSUED AS A MANDATE: 10/23/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [644055] [JAL] [Entered: 10/23/2019 09:11 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION of Appellant Coca-Cola Company to voluntarily dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b). [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 10/22/2019 by email. [643965] [19-2393] [Alan Nichols] [Entered: 10/22/2019 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC. Service: 09/26/2019 by email. [638539] [19-2393] [John Carey] [Entered: 09/26/2019 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Ana (Nah Eun) Kim as of counsel for Appellant Coca-Cola Company. Service: 09/26/2019 by email. [638529] [19-2393] [Ana (Nah Eun) Kim] [Entered: 09/26/2019 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Coca-Cola Company. Service: 09/26/2019 by email. [638527] [19-2393] [Alan Nichols] [Entered: 09/26/2019 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Coca-Cola Company. Service: 09/26/2019 by email. [638525] [19-2393] [Alan Nichols] [Entered: 09/26/2019 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of appearance for A. Shane Nichols as principal counsel for Appellant Coca-Cola Company. Service: 09/26/2019 by email. [638523] [19-2393] [Alan Nichols] [Entered: 09/26/2019 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC. Service: 09/26/2019 by email. [638464] [19-2393] [John Carey] [Entered: 09/26/2019 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Entry of appearance for John C. Carey as principal counsel for Appellee Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC. Service: 09/26/2019 by email. [638463] [19-2393] [John Carey] [Entered: 09/26/2019 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 Note to file: 19-2393 (COMPANION started 09/17/2019) with 19-1825. These cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel for oral argument. [636192] [19-1825, 19-2393] [JAL] [Entered: 09/17/2019 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/12/2019. [635151] Entry of Appearance is due 09/26/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 09/26/2019. Docketing Statement is due 09/26/2019. Appellant's brief is due 11/12/2019. [JAL] [Entered: 09/12/2019 03:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rothschild Connected Devices v. Coca-Cola Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES INNOVATIONS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John C. Carey Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: THE COCA-COLA COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Alan Shane Nichols Esq. |
| Represented By: | Ana (Nah Eun) Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
