Apple Inc.In re: Apple Inc.
Petitioner: In re: APPLE INC.
Respondent: REMBRANDT WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, LP
Case Number: 20-112
Filed: January 8, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed directing Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP to respond to the petition [ # 2 ] no later than seven days from the date of filing of this order. Any reply in support of the petition is due no later than three days thereafter. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [661643] [LMS] [Entered: 01/09/2020 08:17 AM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 9 Entry of appearance for Henry Y. Huang as of counsel for Petitioner Apple Inc.. Service: 01/08/2020 by email, US mail. [661577] [20-112] [Henry Huang] [Entered: 01/08/2020 04:18 PM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Kathryn Thornton as of counsel for Petitioner Apple Inc.. Service: 01/08/2020 by email, US mail. [661574] [20-112] [Kathryn Thornton] [Entered: 01/08/2020 04:16 PM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Mark D. Rowland as of counsel for Petitioner Apple Inc.. Service: 01/08/2020 by email, US mail. [661573] [20-112] [Mark Rowland] [Entered: 01/08/2020 04:15 PM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 6 Entry of appearance for James R. Batchelder as of counsel for Petitioner Apple Inc.. Service: 01/08/2020 by email, US mail. [661571] [20-112] [James Batchelder] [Entered: 01/08/2020 04:13 PM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Gabrielle E. Higgins as of counsel for Petitioner Apple Inc.. Service: 01/08/2020 by email, US mail. [661567] [20-112] [Gabrielle Higgins] [Entered: 01/08/2020 04:12 PM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Douglas Hallward-Driemeier as principal counsel for Petitioner Apple Inc. Service: 01/07/2020 by US mail. [661401] [MMA] [Entered: 01/08/2020 09:35 AM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 3 Confidential PETITION for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21 filed by Petitioner Apple Inc. corresponding to Doc. No. [ # 2 ]. Service: 01/07/2020 by US mail. [661400] [MMA] [Entered: 01/08/2020 09:33 AM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioner Apple Inc. for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21 [Consent: opposed]. Service: 01/07/2020 by US mail. [661398] [MMA] [Entered: 01/08/2020 09:25 AM]
January 8, 2020 Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 01/07/2019. [661391] Entry of Appearance due 01/22/2020. Certificate of Interest is due on 01/22/2020. [MMA] [Entered: 01/08/2020 09:15 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Apple Inc.In re: Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: REMBRANDT WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, LP
Represented By: Alisa A. Lipski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: APPLE INC.
Represented By: Henry Huang Esq.
Represented By: James Richard Batchelder Esq.
Represented By: Kathryn C. Thornton
Represented By: Douglas Hallward-Driemeier Esq.
Represented By: Mark D. Rowland
Represented By: Gabrielle E. Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?