Princeton Digital Image v. Ubisoft Entertainment SA
UBISOFT, INC. and UBISOFT ENTERTAINMENT SA |
PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION |
20-1204 |
December 4, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE v. UBISOFT ENTERTAINMENT SA |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting motion to extend time to file Appellant's opening brief [ # 13 ] to the extent that Princeton Digital Image Corporation's opening brief is due 02/18/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [666095] [TAM] [Entered: 01/27/2020 11:42 AM] |
Filing 13 MOTION of Appellant Princeton Digital Image Corporation to extend the time to 02/18/2020 to file the February 3, 2020. [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 01/22/2020 by email. [665173] [20-1204] [Francesco Silletta] [Entered: 01/22/2020 02:35 PM] |
Filing 12 Corrected Certificate of Interest for Appellant Princeton Digital Image Corporation. Service: 12/20/2019 by email. [658060] [20-1204] [Jonas McDavit] [Entered: 12/20/2019 10:52 AM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Princeton Digital Image Corporation, Certificate of Interest [ # 4 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 12/31/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [658052] [TAM] [Entered: 12/20/2019 10:29 AM] |
Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Ubisoft Entertainment SA and Ubisoft, Inc.. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657657] [20-1204] [Michelle Marriott] [Entered: 12/18/2019 05:24 PM] |
Filing 9 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Ubisoft Entertainment SA and Ubisoft, Inc.. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657655] [20-1204] [Michelle Marriott] [Entered: 12/18/2019 05:21 PM] |
Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Eric Buresh as of counsel for Appellees Ubisoft Entertainment SA and Ubisoft, Inc.. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657653] [20-1204] [Eric Buresh] [Entered: 12/18/2019 05:17 PM] |
Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Michelle Marriott as principal counsel for Appellees Ubisoft Entertainment SA and Ubisoft, Inc.. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657652] [20-1204] [Michelle Marriott] [Entered: 12/18/2019 05:16 PM] |
Filing 6 Entry of appearance for William D. Findlay as of counsel for Appellant Princeton Digital Image Corporation. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657532] [20-1204] [William Findlay] [Entered: 12/18/2019 01:02 PM] |
Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Francesco D. Silletta as of counsel for Appellant Princeton Digital Image Corporation. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657531] [20-1204] [Francesco Silletta] [Entered: 12/18/2019 01:00 PM] |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Princeton Digital Image Corporation. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657529] [20-1204] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 11 ] [Jonas McDavit] [Entered: 12/18/2019 12:57 PM] |
Filing 3 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Princeton Digital Image Corporation. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657527] [20-1204] [Jonas McDavit] [Entered: 12/18/2019 12:56 PM] |
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Jonas R. McDavit as principal counsel for Appellant Princeton Digital Image Corporation. Service: 12/18/2019 by email. [657525] [20-1204] [Jonas McDavit] [Entered: 12/18/2019 12:55 PM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 11/26/2019. [653874] Entry of Appearance due 12/18/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 12/18/2019. Docketing Statement due 12/18/2019. Appellant's brief is due 02/03/2020. [TAM] [Entered: 12/04/2019 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.