BlackBerry Limited v. Facebook, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: INSTAGRAM, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, WHATSAPP, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation and SNAP INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: BLACKBERRY LIMITED, a Canadian corporation
Case Number: 20-1256
Filed: December 17, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 10, 2020 BLACKBERRY LIMITED v. FACEBOOK, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER staying the briefing schedule pending the court's disposition of the motion. The official caption for the consolidated appeals is revised as reflected above. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [668519] [LMS] [Entered: 02/05/2020 09:36 AM]
January 24, 2020 Filing 17 Entry of appearance for Patrick Schmidt as of counsel for Appellant BlackBerry Limited. Service: 01/24/2020 by email. [666005] [20-1256] [Patrick Schmidt] [Entered: 01/24/2020 06:49 PM]
January 22, 2020 Filing 16 RESPONSE of Appellees Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Snap Inc. and WhatsApp, Inc. to the motion to extend time to file brief [ # 15 ] filed by Appellant BlackBerry Limited, motion to waive requirements of brief or appendix [ # 15 ] filed by Appellant BlackBerry Limited. Service: 01/22/2020 by email. [665302] [20-1256] [Heidi Keefe] [Entered: 01/22/2020 08:24 PM]
January 14, 2020 Filing 15 MOTION of Appellant BlackBerry Limited to extend the time to 03/03/2020 to file the Appellant BlackBerry's Opening Brief currently due on 2/18/20., Expand word limit of appellant's opening brief from 14,000 to 16,000 words. Expand word limit of appellees' answering brief (if they join the same brief) from 14,000 to 16,000 words. Expand word limit of appellant's reply from 7,000 to 8,000 words. [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 01/14/2020 by email. [662869] [20-1256] [Sanford Weisburst] [Entered: 01/14/2020 11:51 AM]
January 9, 2020 Filing 14 Note to file: The following cases are associated: 20-1256 (Lead) with 20-1258 (Member Case). FURTHER ENTRIES WILL BE ADDED TO THE LEAD APPEAL ONLY. [661721] [20-1256, 20-1258] [MMA] [Entered: 01/09/2020 10:13 AM]
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER consolidating appeals (20-1256 and 20-1258). The revised official caption is reflected in the order. Appellant's brief is due 02/18/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [661718] [20-1256, 20-1258] [MMA] [Entered: 01/09/2020 10:11 AM]
January 6, 2020 Filing 12 Note to file: 20-1258 (COMP COMPANION started 01/06/2020) with 20-1256. These cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel for oral argument. [660874] [20-1256, 20-1258] [MMA] [Entered: 01/06/2020 12:12 PM]
January 2, 2020 Filing 11 Entry of appearance for Matthew J. Brigham as of counsel for Appellees Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC and WhatsApp, Inc.. Service: 01/02/2020 by email. [660405] [20-1256] [Matthew Brigham] [Entered: 01/02/2020 07:46 PM]
January 2, 2020 Filing 10 Entry of appearance for Mark Randolph Weinstein as of counsel for Appellees Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC and WhatsApp, Inc.. Service: 01/02/2020 by email. [660328] [20-1256] [Mark Weinstein] [Entered: 01/02/2020 04:23 PM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 9 Entry of appearance for Richard Lowry as of counsel for Appellant BlackBerry Limited. Service: 12/31/2019 by email. [659944] [20-1256] [Richard Lowry] [Entered: 12/31/2019 04:43 PM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Pushkal Mishra as of counsel for Appellant BlackBerry Limited. Service: 12/31/2019 by email. [659936] [20-1256] [Pushkal Mishra] [Entered: 12/31/2019 04:31 PM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellant BlackBerry Limited. Service: 12/31/2019 by email. [659918] [20-1256] [Sanford Weisburst] [Entered: 12/31/2019 04:03 PM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellant BlackBerry Limited. Service: 12/31/2019 by email. [659916] [20-1256] [Sanford Weisburst] [Entered: 12/31/2019 04:01 PM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Sanford I. Weisburst as principal counsel for Appellant BlackBerry Limited. Service: 12/31/2019 by email. [659911] [20-1256] [Sanford Weisburst] [Entered: 12/31/2019 03:56 PM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC and WhatsApp, Inc.. Service: 12/31/2019 by email. [659774] [20-1256] [Heidi Keefe] [Entered: 12/31/2019 11:37 AM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC and WhatsApp, Inc.. Service: 12/31/2019 by email. [659773] [20-1256] [Heidi Keefe] [Entered: 12/31/2019 11:36 AM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Heidi L. Keefe as principal counsel for Appellees Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC and WhatsApp, Inc.. Service: 12/31/2019 by email. [659772] [20-1256] [Heidi Keefe] [Entered: 12/31/2019 11:34 AM]
December 17, 2019 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 12/12/2019. [657087] Entry of Appearance due 12/31/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 12/31/2019. Docketing Statement due 12/31/2019. Appellant's brief is due 02/18/2020. [MMA] [Entered: 12/17/2019 11:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: BlackBerry Limited v. Facebook, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: INSTAGRAM, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Represented By: Heidi Lyn Keefe
Represented By: Mark R. Weinstein
Represented By: Matthew J. Brigham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WHATSAPP, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Heidi Lyn Keefe
Represented By: Mark R. Weinstein
Represented By: Matthew J. Brigham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Heidi Lyn Keefe
Represented By: Mark R. Weinstein
Represented By: Matthew J. Brigham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SNAP INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Yar Roman Chaikovsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BLACKBERRY LIMITED, a Canadian corporation
Represented By: Jordan Ross Jaffe
Represented By: Sanford Ian Weisburst
Represented By: Richard A. Lowry
Represented By: Pushkal Mishra
Represented By: Patrick T. Schmidt Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?