Evolved Wireless, LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc.
| EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC |
| ZTE (USA) INC. |
| 20-1339 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Appellee ZTE (USA) Inc., Entries of Appearance - C. McMahon, J. Reiziss, and B. Jones; Certificate of Interest; and Docketing Statement [ # 4 ], [ # 5 ], [ # 6 ], [ # 7 ], [ # 8 ], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). No corrections are required. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [665503] [JAL] [Entered: 01/23/2020 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Brian A. Jones as of counsel for Appellee ZTE (USA) Inc. Service: 01/22/2020 by email. [665298] [20-1339] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 9 ] [Brian Jones] [Entered: 01/22/2020 07:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Jay H. Reiziss as of counsel for Appellee ZTE (USA) Inc. Service: 01/22/2020 by email. [665297] [20-1339] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 9 ] [Jay Reiziss] [Entered: 01/22/2020 07:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellee ZTE (USA) Inc. Service: 01/22/2020 by email. [665295] [20-1339] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 9 ] [Charles McMahon] [Entered: 01/22/2020 07:19 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Appellee ZTE (USA) Inc. Service: 01/22/2020 by email. [665294] [20-1339] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 9 ] [Charles McMahon] [Entered: 01/22/2020 07:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Charles M. McMahon as principal counsel for Appellee ZTE (USA) Inc. Service: 01/22/2020 by email. [665292] [20-1339] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 9 ] [Charles McMahon] [Entered: 01/22/2020 07:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 Note to file: The following cases are associated:20-1335 (Lead) with 20-1337, 20-1339, 20-1340, and 20-1363 (Member Cases). FURTHER ENTRIES WILL BE ADDED TO THE LEAD APPEAL ONLY. [664437] [20-1335, 20-1337, 20-1339, 20-1340, 20-1363] [TAM] [Entered: 01/21/2020 09:37 AM] |
Filing 2
ORDER consolidating appeals (20-1335 with 20-1337, 20-1339, 20-1340, and 20-1363). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [664433] [20-1335, 20-1337, 20-1339, 20-1340, 20-1363] [TAM] [Entered: 01/21/2020 09:33 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 01/02/2020. [661553] Entry of Appearance due 01/22/2020. Certificate of Interest is due on 01/22/2020. Docketing Statement due 01/22/2020. Appellant's brief is due 03/09/2020. [TAM] [Entered: 01/08/2020 03:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Evolved Wireless, LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Farnan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ZTE (USA) INC. | |
| Represented By: | Kelly Farnan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
