Netlist, Inc. v. ITC
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION |
NETLIST, INC. |
20-1780 |
May 7, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Robert Needham as principal counsel for Appellee ITC. Service: 05/08/2020 by email. [693229] [20-1780] [Robert Needham] [Entered: 05/08/2020 02:19 PM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 04/29/2020. [692824] Entry of Appearance due 05/21/2020. Certificate of Interest is due on 05/21/2020. Docketing Statement due 06/08/2020. Certified List due on 06/16/2020. [MMA] [Entered: 05/07/2020 12:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Netlist, Inc. v. ITC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION | |
Represented By: | Robert John Needham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: NETLIST, INC. | |
Represented By: | James M. Wodarski Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.