Martin v. DHS
CLAY MARTIN |
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
20-1810 |
May 20, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Fee paid on 05/20/2020. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: 569610000338. [695852] [JCP] [Entered: 05/20/2020 09:56 AM] |
Filing 2 Clerk's letter to the arbitrator directing that the certified list be filed. Certified List due on 06/29/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [695834] [JAL] [Entered: 05/20/2020 09:30 AM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 04/21/2020. 15(c) is due on 06/03/2020. Entry of Appearance is due 06/03/2020. [695827] [JAL] [Entered: 05/20/2020 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Martin v. DHS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: CLAY MARTIN | |
Represented By: | Clay Martin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | |
Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.