Tao v. DVA
| DEBRA TAO |
| DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS |
| 20-1834 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Miles Karson as principal counsel for Respondent DVA. Service: 05/29/2020 by email. [697971] [20-1834] [Miles Karson] [Entered: 05/29/2020 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/14/2020. [696673] 15(c) due on 06/05/2020. Entry of Appearance due 06/05/2020. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/05/2020. Docketing Statement due 06/22/2020. Certified List due on 07/01/2020. [MMA] [Entered: 05/22/2020 04:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tao v. DVA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DEBRA TAO | |
| Represented By: | James Solomon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
