RajagopalanIn re: Rajagopalan
Appellant: In re: RAGHAVAN RAJAGOPALAN
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Case Number: 20-1956
Filed: July 1, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 18, 2021 In Re RAJAGOPALAN

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2020 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/26/2020. [704997] Entry of Appearance is due 07/15/2020. Certificate of Interest is due on 07/15/2020. Docketing Statement is due 07/31/2020. Certified List is due on 08/10/2020. [EKD] [Entered: 07/01/2020 03:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: RajagopalanIn re: Rajagopalan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: In re: RAGHAVAN RAJAGOPALAN
Represented By: Robert Fritz Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Represented By: Thomas W. Krause
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?