Cinemark Holdings, Inc.In re: Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
In re: CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC., REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP and AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC. |
INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION |
21-103 |
October 21, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Jonathan S. Franklin, Richard S. Zembek as counsel for Petitioners AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Regal Entertainment Group. Service: 10/21/2020 by clerk. [730694] [MMA] [Entered: 10/21/2020 04:30 PM] |
Filing 4 MOTION of Petitioners AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Regal Entertainment Group to waive confidentiality requirements. Service: 10/21/2020 by email. [730693] [MMA] [Entered: 10/21/2020 04:28 PM] |
Filing 3 Confidential Petition for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21 filed by Petitioners AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Regal Entertainment Group corresponding to Doc. No. [ # 2 ]. Service: 10/21/2020 by email. [730692] [MMA] [Entered: 10/21/2020 04:26 PM] |
Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioners AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Regal Entertainment Group for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 10/21/2020 by email. [730690] [MMA] [Entered: 10/21/2020 04:23 PM] |
Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 10/21/2020. [730688] Entry of Appearance due 11/04/2020. Certificate of Interest is due on 11/04/2020. [MMA] [Entered: 10/21/2020 04:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.