Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Google LLC
UNILOC 2017 LLC |
GOOGLE LLC |
21-1034 |
October 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant Uniloc 2017 LLC. The opening brief is due 01/07/2021.Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [739859] [KMH] [Entered: 12/03/2020 09:28 AM] |
Filing 10 MOTION of Appellant Uniloc 2017 LLC to extend the time to 01/07/2021 to file brief. Service: 12/02/2020 by email. [739486] [21-1034] [Aaron Jacobs] [Entered: 12/02/2020 09:08 AM] |
Filing 9 Corrected Entry of appearance for Dan L. Bagatell; Andrew T. Dufresne; Tara L. Kurtis; Robert Unikel as counsel for Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/28/2020 by email. [732015] [21-1034] [Dan Bagatell] [Entered: 10/28/2020 11:44 AM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee Google LLC, Entry of Appearance [ # 5 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 11/02/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [731442] [KMH] [Entered: 10/26/2020 03:32 PM] |
Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/23/2020 by email. [731020] [21-1034] [Dan Bagatell] [Entered: 10/23/2020 11:02 AM] |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/23/2020 by email. [731018] [21-1034] [Dan Bagatell] [Entered: 10/23/2020 11:00 AM] |
Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Dan L. Bagatell; Andrew T. Dufresne; Tara L. Kurtis; Robert Unikel as counsel for Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/23/2020 by email. [731016] [21-1034] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [Dan Bagatell] [Entered: 10/23/2020 10:56 AM] |
Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Uniloc 2017 LLC. Service: 10/20/2020 by email. [730060] [21-1034] [Aaron Jacobs] [Entered: 10/20/2020 08:52 AM] |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Uniloc 2017 LLC. Service: 10/20/2020 by email. [730059] [21-1034] [Aaron Jacobs] [Entered: 10/20/2020 08:52 AM] |
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Aaron S. Jacobs as counsel for Appellant Uniloc 2017 LLC. Service: 10/20/2020 by email. [730058] [21-1034] [Aaron Jacobs] [Entered: 10/20/2020 08:50 AM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/06/2020. [727941] Entry of Appearance is due on 10/23/2020. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/23/2020. Docketing Statement is due on 10/23/2020. Appellant's brief is due on 12/08/2020. [KMH] [Entered: 10/09/2020 03:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Google LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: UNILOC 2017 LLC | |
Represented By: | Aaron Jacobs Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: GOOGLE LLC | |
Represented By: | Robert Unikel |
Represented By: | Andrew Dufresne |
Represented By: | Tara Lauren Kurtis |
Represented By: | Dan L. Bagatell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.