Koopmann v. US
EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, JAMES H. BIESTEK, ROBERT L. BEAVIS, RONALD L. BLASH, PAUL L. BAILEY, LAWRENCE C. BECKER, JON R. BOSTON, GEORGE A. BLEYLE, STANLEY M. ANDERSON, ROBERT M. BENZIES, CHARLES M. ADAMS, LOUIS C. ATKINS, WAYNE E. ALLEN, WILLIAM C. BARHAM, JOSEPH E. ARMSTEAD, DONALD A. BLANCHARD and JAMES R. ALLEN |
WILLIAM C. BRASHEAR and WILLIAM KOOPMANN |
UNITED STATES |
21-1329 |
November 25, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellants William C. Brashear and William Koopmann, Notice of Unrepresented Person [ # 10 ], [ # 12 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 01/26/2021. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [748632] [MMA] [Entered: 01/12/2021 09:19 AM] |
Filing 12 MODIFIED ENTRY: Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant William C. Brashear. Service: 01/05/2021 by clerk. [747167]--[Edited 01/12/2021 by MMA] This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [ # 13 ] [JCP] [Entered: 01/05/2021 08:37 PM] |
Filing 11 MODIFIED ENTRY: MOTION of Appellants William C. Brashear and William Koopmann to extend time. Service: 01/05/2021 by clerk. [747166]--[Edited 01/11/2021 by MMA] [JCP] [Entered: 01/05/2021 08:36 PM] |
Filing 10 MODIFIED ENTRY: Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant William Koopmann. Service: 01/05/2021 by clerk. [747163]--[Edited 01/12/2021 by MMA] This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [ # 13 ] [JCP] [Entered: 01/05/2021 08:35 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant William Koopmann, Notice of Unrepresented Person [ # 6 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 12/28/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [741743] [MMA] [Entered: 12/10/2020 10:33 AM] |
Filing 8 MOTION of Appellee US to dismiss appeal because the court of Federal claims has not entered the required Judgment. Cases to be terminated: 21-1329. (Briefing suspended pursuant to FCR 31 pending resolution of the motion). Service: 12/09/2020 by US mail, email. [741395]--[Edited 12/09/2020 by MMA - Reason: to correct relief] [Janet Bradley] [Entered: 12/09/2020 11:51 AM] |
Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Michael J. Haungs as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 12/09/2020 by US mail, email. [741349] [21-1329] [Michael Haungs] [Entered: 12/09/2020 10:26 AM] |
Filing 5 Corrected Entry of appearance for Janet A. Bradley as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 12/07/2020 by US mail, email. [740673] [21-1329] [Janet Bradley] [Entered: 12/07/2020 12:57 PM] |
Filing 6 MODIFIED ENTRY: Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant William Koopmann. Service: 12/08/2020 by clerk. [741027]--[Edited 12/10/2020 by MMA] This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [ # 9 ] [JCP] [Entered: 12/08/2020 10:37 AM] |
Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Janet A. Bradley as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 12/02/2020 by US mail, email. [739507] [21-1329] [Janet Bradley] [Entered: 12/02/2020 09:36 AM] |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid in the United States Court of Federal Claims on 11/12/2020. [739166] [MMA] [Entered: 12/01/2020 11:01 AM] |
Filing 2 Amended docket sheet from United States Court of Federal Claims. [739165] [MMA] [Entered: 12/01/2020 10:58 AM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 11/12/2020. [738470] Fee/IFP due on 12/14/2020. Entry of Appearance due 12/14/2020. Appellants' Informal brief are due 12/24/2020.--[Edited 11/25/2020 by MMA to modify deadlines due to mailing] [MMA] [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.