The California Institute v. Broadcom Limited
Defendant / Appellant: BROADCOM CORPORATION, AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, BROADCOM LIMITED, APPLE INC., BROADCOM LIMITED, nka Broadcom Inc. and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, nka Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Case Number: 21-1527
Filed: January 11, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2022 Filing 18 JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Each Side Bears Its Own Costs. Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click # here . Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [828982] [20-2222, 21-1527] [MVH] [Entered: 02/04/2022 09:17 AM]
February 4, 2022 Filing 17 OPINION filed for the court by Lourie, Circuit Judge; Linn, Circuit Judge and Dyk, Circuit Judge. Dyk, Circuit Judge, concurring-in-part and dissenting-inpart. Precedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [828979] [20-2222, 21-1527] [MVH] [Entered: 02/04/2022 09:16 AM]
February 12, 2021 Filing 16 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 20-2222 Lead with 21-1527 Consolidated Member Case. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [755951] [20-2222, 21-1527] [EKD] [Entered: 02/12/2021 04:39 PM]
February 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting motions to consolidate appeals [ # 753614-2 ] [ # 14 ] filed by Appellants. The appeals are consolidated. The revised caption is reflected above. The California Institute of Technology's response brief in these appeals is due no later than March 11, 2021. No later than seven days from the date of filing of this order, Appellants are directed to file a corrected opening brief that includes the revised caption. A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to these appeals. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [755915] [20-2222, 21-1527] [LMS] [Entered: 02/12/2021 03:22 PM]
February 3, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION of Appellants Broadcom Limited, Broadcom Corporation, Avago Technologies Limited and Apple Inc. to consolidate appeals (No. 21-1527 with No. 20-2222). Service: 02/03/2021 by email. [753617] [21-1527] [William Lee] [Entered: 02/03/2021 11:19 AM]
January 27, 2021 Filing 13 CORRECTED ORDER: correcting clerk order to modify the official caption [12],clerk order [12]; reason(s): to add The to appellee's name. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [752072] [20-2222, 21-1527] [LMS] [Entered: 01/27/2021 12:42 PM]
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER modifying the official caption. The revised official caption is reflected in the order. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [752051] [20-2222, 21-1527] [LMS] [Entered: 01/27/2021 11:56 AM]
January 25, 2021 Filing 11 Entry of appearance for Kevin A. Smith as counsel for Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 01/25/2021 by email. [751637] [21-1527] [Kathleen Sullivan] [Entered: 01/25/2021 05:30 PM]
January 25, 2021 Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 01/25/2021 by email. [751633] [21-1527] [Kathleen Sullivan] [Entered: 01/25/2021 05:19 PM]
January 25, 2021 Filing 9 Certificate of Interest for Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 01/25/2021 by email. [751632] [21-1527] [Kathleen Sullivan] [Entered: 01/25/2021 05:14 PM]
January 25, 2021 Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Kathleen M. Sullivan; Derek L. Shaffer; James R. Asperger; Kevin P.B. Johnson; Edward J. DeFranco; Todd M. Briggs; Brian P. Biddinger as counsel for Appellee California Institute of Technology. Service: 01/25/2021 by email. [751630] [21-1527]--[Edited 01/27/2021 by EKD to correct docket text] [Kathleen Sullivan] [Entered: 01/25/2021 05:09 PM]
January 22, 2021 Filing 7 RESPONSE of Appellants Broadcom Corporation, Broadcom Limited, Avago Technologies Limited and Apple Inc. to the clerk order for other relief [ # 3 ] , clerk order to set case manager tickler date [ # 3 ] , clerk order [ # 3 ]. Service: 01/22/2021 by email. [751168] [21-1527] [William Lee] [Entered: 01/22/2021 03:18 PM]
January 22, 2021 Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellants Broadcom Corporation, Broadcom Limited, Avago Technologies Limited and Apple Inc.. Service: 01/22/2021 by email. [751162] [21-1527] [William Lee] [Entered: 01/22/2021 03:15 PM]
January 22, 2021 Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Appellants Broadcom Corporation, Broadcom Limited, Avago Technologies Limited and Apple Inc.. Service: 01/22/2021 by email. [751158] [21-1527] [William Lee] [Entered: 01/22/2021 03:14 PM]
January 22, 2021 Filing 4 Entry of appearance for William F. Lee; Mark D. Selwyn; Joseph J. Mueller; Lauren B. Fletcher; Madeleine C. Laupheimer; Steven J. Horn; David P. Yin as counsel for Appellants Broadcom Corporation, Broadcom Limited, Avago Technologies Limited and Apple Inc.. Service: 01/22/2021 by email. [751152] [21-1527] [William Lee] [Entered: 01/22/2021 03:11 PM]
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Within seven days of the date of filing of this order, Appellants are directed to inform the court whether the captions for these appeals should be revised. The California Institute of Technology may file a reply no later than three days thereafter. (See order) Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [749894] [20-2222, 21-1527] [NL] [Entered: 01/15/2021 04:48 PM]
January 15, 2021 Filing 2 Note to File: The following cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel: 20-2222 and 21-1527. [749778] [20-2222, 21-1527] [EKD] [Entered: 01/15/2021 01:55 PM]
January 11, 2021 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 01/08/2021. [748445] Entry of Appearance is due on 01/25/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 01/25/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 01/25/2021. Appellants' brief is due on 03/12/2021. [EKD] [Entered: 01/11/2021 03:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: The California Institute v. Broadcom Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Represented By: Mark D. Selwyn
Represented By: Joseph J. Mueller
Represented By: Steven Jared Horn
Represented By: Lauren B. Fletcher
Represented By: David P. Yin
Represented By: William F. Lee
Represented By: Madeleine C. Laupheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Represented By: Mark D. Selwyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BROADCOM LIMITED
Represented By: Mark D. Selwyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: APPLE INC.
Represented By: Mark D. Selwyn
Represented By: Joseph J. Mueller
Represented By: Steven Jared Horn
Represented By: Lauren B. Fletcher
Represented By: David P. Yin
Represented By: William F. Lee
Represented By: Madeleine C. Laupheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BROADCOM LIMITED, nka Broadcom Inc.
Represented By: Mark D. Selwyn
Represented By: Joseph J. Mueller
Represented By: Steven Jared Horn
Represented By: Lauren B. Fletcher
Represented By: David P. Yin
Represented By: William F. Lee
Represented By: Madeleine C. Laupheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, nka Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited
Represented By: Mark D. Selwyn
Represented By: Joseph J. Mueller
Represented By: Steven Jared Horn
Represented By: Lauren B. Fletcher
Represented By: David P. Yin
Represented By: William F. Lee
Represented By: Madeleine C. Laupheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Represented By: Edward J. DeFranco
Represented By: Kathleen M. Sullivan
Represented By: Kevin Alexander Smith
Represented By: Kevin P.B. Johnson
Represented By: Todd Michael Briggs Esq.
Represented By: Brian P. Biddinger
Represented By: Derek L. Shaffer
Represented By: James R. Asperger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?