Eagle View Technologies, Inc. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: VERISK ANALYTICS, INC. and XACTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and EAGLE VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Case Number: 21-1743
Filed: March 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Filing 4 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 21-1048 Lead with 21-1049 and 21-1743 Consolidated Member Cases. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [765587] [21-1048, 21-1049, 21-1743] [EKD] [Entered: 03/30/2021 11:18 AM]
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER filed granting motion [ # 762995-2 ] [ # 2 ] only to the extent that the appellants' December 30, 2020 corrected opening brief is withdrawn, the above-captioned appeals are consolidated, and the briefing schedule is as follows: the appellants' opening brief, not to exceed 14,000 words, is due no later than April 22, 2021; the appellees' response brief, not to exceed 14,000 words, is due no later than June 8, 2021, and the appellants' reply brief, not to exceed 7,000 words, is due no later than June 29, 2021. The revised official caption is reflected above. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [765569] [21-1048, 21-1743] [LMS] [Entered: 03/30/2021 10:22 AM]
March 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION of Appellants Xactware Solutions, Inc. and Verisk Analytics, Inc. to consolidate appeals (Nos. 21-1048, 21-1049, and 21-1743), to set briefing schedule. Service: 03/17/2021 by email. [762999] [21-1743] [Mark Perry] [Entered: 03/17/2021 02:30 PM]
March 17, 2021 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 03/15/2021. [762911] Entry of Appearance is due on 03/31/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 03/31/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 03/31/2021. Appellants' brief is due on 05/17/2021. [EKD] [Entered: 03/17/2021 11:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eagle View Technologies, Inc. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: VERISK ANALYTICS, INC.
Represented By: Scott S. Christie Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: XACTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Represented By: Scott S. Christie Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Represented By: Liza M. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: EAGLE VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By: Liza M. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?