ImmunoGen, Inc. v. Hirshfeld
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office |
IMMUNOGEN, INC. |
21-1939 |
May 11, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant ImmunoGen, Inc. The opening brief is due 07/26/2021. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [783666] [KMH] [Entered: 07/01/2021 09:07 AM] |
Filing 8 MOTION of Appellant ImmunoGen, Inc. to extend the time to 07/26/2021 to file brief. Service: 06/29/2021 by email. [783157] [21-1939] [Pauline Pelletier] [Entered: 06/29/2021 11:20 AM] |
Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Service: 06/10/2021 by email. [779476] [21-1939] [Daniel Kazhdan] [Entered: 06/10/2021 12:14 PM] |
Filing 6 Certificate of Compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 10(b) [The Transcript of Proceedings] for Appellant ImmunoGen, Inc.. Service: 05/25/2021 by email. [777051] [21-1939] [Michael Joffre] [Entered: 05/25/2021 03:53 PM] |
Filing 5 Docketing Statement for the Appellant ImmunoGen, Inc.. Service: 05/25/2021 by email. [777050] [21-1939] [Michael Joffre] [Entered: 05/25/2021 03:49 PM] |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant ImmunoGen, Inc.. Service: 05/25/2021 by email. [777049] [21-1939] [Michael Joffre] [Entered: 05/25/2021 03:48 PM] |
Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Michael E. Joffre; Pauline M. Pelletier; Eric K. Steffe as counsel for Appellant ImmunoGen, Inc.. Service: 05/25/2021 by email. [777047] [21-1939] [Michael Joffre] [Entered: 05/25/2021 03:46 PM] |
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Daniel Kazhdan; Mary L. Kelly; Thomas W. Krause; Farheena Y. Rasheed; Matthew J. Mezger as counsel for Appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Service: 05/25/2021 by email. [776939] [21-1939] [Daniel Kazhdan] [Entered: 05/25/2021 11:57 AM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/04/2021. [774299] Entry of Appearance due 05/25/2021. Certificate of Interest due 05/25/2021. Docketing Statement due 06/10/2021. Appellant's brief is due 07/12/2021. [KMH] [Entered: 05/11/2021 01:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: ImmunoGen, Inc. v. Hirshfeld | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office | |
Represented By: | Thomas W. Krause |
Represented By: | Daniel Kazhdan |
Represented By: | Mary L. Kelly Ph.D. |
Represented By: | Matthew James Mezger |
Represented By: | Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: IMMUNOGEN, INC. | |
Represented By: | Craig Crandall Reilly Esq. |
Represented By: | Michael E. Joffre |
Represented By: | Pauline Pelletier |
Represented By: | Eric Steffe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.