Tanasescu v. US
SIMONA TANASESCU, on behalf of herself and S.T., a minor |
UNITED STATES |
21-2117 |
July 7, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Paper document received from Simona Tanasescu. (PENDING REVIEW). [795641] [JCP] [Entered: 08/27/2021 06:36 AM] |
Filing 5 MODIFIED ENTRY INFORMAL BRIEF FILED with SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX by Appellee US. Service: 08/20/2021 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [794363]--[Edited 09/03/2021 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Miles Karson] [Entered: 08/20/2021 03:10 PM] |
Filing 4 MODIFIED ENTRY: INFORMAL BRIEF FILED with APPENDIX by Appellant Simona Tanasescu. Service: 07/30/2021 by US mail. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [789699] --[Edited 08/04/2021 by LMN - compliance review complete] [JCP] [Entered: 07/30/2021 04:16 PM] |
Filing 3 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and consent to Electronic Service for Appellant Simona Tanasescu. Service: 07/26/2021 by clerk. [788749] [LJ] [Entered: 07/26/2021 04:03 PM] |
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Miles Karson as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 07/13/2021 by email, US mail. [785964] [21-2117] [Miles Karson] [Entered: 07/13/2021 04:08 PM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/25/2021. [784544] Entry of Appearance is due 07/21/2021. Appellant/Petitioner's Informal brief is due 07/28/2021. [LMN] [Entered: 07/07/2021 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.