Carnegie Institution of Washington v. Fenix Diamonds LLC
| MAHENDRA BROTHERS EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED |
| CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON and M7D CORPORATION |
| FENIX DIAMONDS LLC |
| 21-2249 |
| August 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON v. FENIX DIAMONDS LLC |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 REPLY of Cross-Appellant Fenix Diamonds LLC to response [ # 19 ]. Service: 10/21/2021 by email. [807510] [21-2249] [Maxwell Snow] [Entered: 10/21/2021 11:20 PM] |
Filing 21
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 20 ] filed by Cross-Appellant Fenix Diamonds LLC. Fenixs reply in support of its motion to dismiss is due no later than October 21, 2021. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [805365] [NL] [Entered: 10/13/2021 02:27 PM]
|
| Filing 20 MOTION of Cross-Appellant Fenix Diamonds LLC to extend the time to 10/21/2021 to file brief. Service: 10/08/2021 by email. [804722] [21-2249] [Maxwell Snow] [Entered: 10/08/2021 08:03 PM] |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE of Appellants Carnegie Institution of Washington and M7D Corporation to Doc No. [ # 10 ]. Service: 10/07/2021 by email. [804454] [21-2249] [Nathan Kelley] [Entered: 10/07/2021 07:19 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting motion to modify the official caption [ # 17 ] filed by Cross-Appellant Fenix Diamonds LLC. The revised official caption and short caption are reflected in this order. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [802516] [LMS] [Entered: 09/29/2021 11:49 AM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION of Cross-Appellant Fenix Diamonds LLC to modify the official caption. Service: 09/24/2021 by email. [801789] [21-2249] [Maxwell Snow] [Entered: 09/24/2021 08:43 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting motion to extend time [ # 14 ] filed by Appellants Carnegie Institution of Washington and M7D Corporation. Appellants' response to the motion to dismiss is due no later than October 7, 2021. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [801042] [LMS] [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:49 AM]
|
| Filing 15 Entry of appearance for Maxwell B. Snow as counsel for Cross-Appellant Fenix Diamonds LLC. Service: 09/16/2021 by email. [800030] [21-2249] [Maxwell Snow] [Entered: 09/16/2021 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION of Appellants M7D Corporation and Carnegie Institution of Washington to extend time. Service: 09/16/2021 by email. [800029] [21-2249] [Nathan Kelley] [Entered: 09/16/2021 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 Official caption revised to reflect cross-appeal with 21-2315. (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [799654] [JCW] [Entered: 09/15/2021 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 12 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 21-2249 Lead with 21-2315 Cross-Appeal. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [799652] [21-2249, 21-2315] [JCW] [Entered: 09/15/2021 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 11 Corrected Entry of appearance for Nathan K. Kelley; Matthew J. Moffa; Michael Chajon as counsel for Appellants Carnegie Institution of Washington and M7D Corporation. Service: 09/15/2021 by email. [799635] [21-2249] [Nathan Kelley] [Entered: 09/15/2021 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION of Appellee Fenix Diamonds LLC to terminate appeal through dismissal. Cases to be terminated: 21-2249. (Briefing suspended pursuant to FCR 31 pending resolution of the motion). Service: 09/13/2021 by email. [798946] [21-2249] [David Airan] [Entered: 09/13/2021 11:29 PM] |
| Filing 9 Amended Certificate of Interest for Appellee Fenix Diamonds LLC. Service: 09/13/2021 by email. [798945] [21-2249] [David Airan] [Entered: 09/13/2021 11:22 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellants Carnegie Institution of Washington and M7D Corporation, Entry of Appearance [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 09/20/2021. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [798607] [JCW] [Entered: 09/13/2021 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Fenix Diamonds LLC. Service: 09/09/2021 by email. [798218] [21-2249] [David Airan] [Entered: 09/09/2021 08:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Fenix Diamonds LLC. Service: 09/09/2021 by email. [798217] [21-2249] [David Airan] [Entered: 09/09/2021 08:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of appearance for David M. Airan; Steven H. Sklar; Nicole E. Kopinski as counsel for Appellee Fenix Diamonds LLC. Service: 09/09/2021 by email. [798215] [21-2249] [David Airan] [Entered: 09/09/2021 08:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellants Carnegie Institution of Washington and M7D Corporation. Service: 09/09/2021 by email. [798038] [21-2249] [Nathan Kelley] [Entered: 09/09/2021 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellants Carnegie Institution of Washington and M7D Corporation. Service: 09/09/2021 by email. [798037] [21-2249] [Nathan Kelley] [Entered: 09/09/2021 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Nathan K. Kelley; Terrence J. Wikberg; Matthew J. Moffa; Michael Chajon as counsel for Appellants Carnegie Institution of Washington and M7D Corporation. Service: 09/09/2021 by email. [798036] [21-2249] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 8 ] [Nathan Kelley] [Entered: 09/09/2021 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 08/25/2021. [795414] Entry of Appearance is due on 09/09/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 09/09/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 09/09/2021. Appellants' brief is due on 10/25/2021. [JCW] [Entered: 08/26/2021 11:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
